0 members (),
161
guests, and
10
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 98
Member
|
I've seen a lot worse, even by "Masters". One of my "Dead Giveaways" about DIY's is that the Expurt Lectric Design Services available at Lowes and Home Despot never know about reduced neutrals, the use of which I consider as a sign that the installer had some sort of clue. Of course, that would slightly reduce sales of copper for the big boxes. The clerks in Supply houses aren't hip to the reduced neutral idea either.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 680
Member
|
Shouldn't there be a plastic bushing on the PVC
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,213
Member
|
Almost Fried, with all the switched power supplies everywhere, reduced neutrals is no longer such a good idea. (Not that residences are going to have large VFDs or whole-house UPSs, but still) We've had serious problems in buildings built with undersized neutrals and have been forced into expensive repairs to try to remedy the (I'm not exaggerating) cherry-red neutrals! It honestly wouldn't surprise me if future revisions of NEC mandate neutrals LARGER than that of the phase conductors to account for the continuous harmonic current the neutrals are subjected to. Either that, or OCP on the neutrals as well as the phase conductors.
[This message has been edited by SteveFehr (edited 10-21-2006).]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445 Likes: 3
Cat Servant Member
|
A couple of random thoughts:
- It's a disaster rebuild. I would not expect things to return to normal.... ever! In the race to get thing up and running again, I expect that there are lots of 'good enough' stuff taking place. It is also doubtful anyone will return and 'do it right' before it breaks, or the next hurricane comes along;
- Romex, like any other wiring method, needs to be attached to the panel. The bid PVC fitting may work, but it's not correct. Connectors do two things. One, as mentioned, is provide strain relief; wull on the cable, and the force never makes it to the wire connections. The other is, the connector keeps sparks in the box- and not in the wall, to start a fire. This is why we use knock out seals as well.
- Shared neutrals, as well as reduced neutrals, are far less forgiving. As we use more electronics, I expect the reduced neutral will be limited to feeders- and branch circuits will all get full size (or even over size) neutrals. Kind of wonder just how one would use a 'reduced', or even 'shared', neutral with romex, though! Such an approach would have to have been designed into the cable.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 794 Likes: 3
Member
|
It honestly wouldn't surprise me if future revisions of NEC mandate neutrals LARGER than that of the phase conductors to account for the continuous harmonic current the neutrals are subjected to. If the two hots are 180 degrees in phase apart, you can get away with normal or undersized neutrals. The timing of the harmonic current draw on one such phase is the same for the other phase. Which means that the harmonics on the neutral would cancel (if equal). Where the problem comes up is in systems where the phases are 120 degrees apart. Then you will not get cancellation on the neutral, as the timing of the harmonic currents are different.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 111
Member
|
Can't do that in Canada eh! 1- NM must have a connector that's designed for use with such cable and shall be used to secure the cable in place adequately.[CEC 12-3022(3)] 2- Close the openings through which the conductors pass in such a manner that any remaining opening will not permit entrance of a test rod 6.75mm in diameter[12-3022(e)]
Also, don't you have to keep the main conductors seperate from the other conductors in that type of panel? You know, the ones with the little wall attached to the cover that seperates them?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,213
Member
|
Nope, no walls or separation like that in the US, it's all just jammed in there pretty much however the installer feels like. In fact, this is the first time I've ever heard of that! How does that work, doesn't that really put a crimper on how you can route cables into the panel?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
Member
|
Could have reduced the cable count by using 12/3 HR's, and fanned them out on that nailer the 10/3 is on, and spread them out in the 1/2" KO's of the panel. Anyway, it would not fly here either. No strain releif connectors, and de-rating all of those bundles.
Mark Heller "Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,934 Likes: 34
Member
|
I can pick any job apart but I try not to be too nasty. I bet this is an improvement over the wiring it replaced so I am not that concerned. I also understand stovepiping all those RXes out one hole ain't legal but where are they going? I don't see them being moved around much. It may not be pretty but I bet it won't burn the house down. Let's go look at what the "gas" man did.
Greg Fretwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,064
Member
|
|
|
|
Tom
Shinnston, WV USA
Posts: 1,044
Joined: January 2001
|
|
|
|