1 members (Scott35),
128
guests, and
12
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445 Likes: 3
Cat Servant Member
|
We might be confusing "in the floor" with "ON the floor".
Floor boxes, and their covers, are evaluated with a lot of attention given to "what happens when the floor is mopped or the carpet is cleaned?" Likewise, it is assumed that the receptacles will be in the middle of the floor, for all to run into.
Remove those concerns, and then the remaining worry is "what about falling crud?" I think you can see why the NEC bans 'face-up' receptacles in kitchen counters.
I think a case for mounting receptacles on the floor, face up, where protected by furniture can be made. Think of that cord dropping between a desk and the wall; the plug is certainly more likely to be damaged (by the desk pressing onto it) coming out of the wall, than coming up from the floor. While there might be a possibility of someone spilling their coffee' this risk is not even in the same league as a kitchen counter (which is deliberately made wet and dirty, regularily).
I see this as a design issue. Plugmold on the floor, behind the sofa? Sure. Plugmold on the wall, along the jacuzzi? No Way.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
Moderator
|
406.4(E) is the only section that is relevent in my opinion, and its scope is very limited.
Ryan Jackson, Salt Lake City
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
Member
|
I agree with Reno. This is not a code issue, but a design issue. Receptacles are permitted faceup in/on the floor. The subject to severe physical damage is important. The only one(s) who can make that judgement are the ones who can actually physically see it. From our vantage point here, we cannot. They make "doghouse" type enclosures designed for this type of installation. Would that be a consideration? Remember part of the design consideration is the environment in which this installation is in...CHILDREN!!!
Pierre Belarge
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
Member
|
Scott, it looks a convienient foot rest in that picture, due to placement alone. "This will be going into a computer room for elementry school kids under the desk." That in mind, it is an attractive nuisance On top of that, unlike many Floor Outlets, or IMO what should be more appropriate in situations like that, Floor Access Boxes. That would be mop tight, resistive to splilled Cool Aid, accumilatate dirt and debris over time, and reccessed to resist damage to the outlet. (Back in my service work days, I saw many receptical failures/damage due to things like that.) As well as facilitate repurposing of the room of reconfiguration of the furnature in the future. Even "Dog-House" fittings with a flex mounted to the feed the stuff mounted on the furnature would be better. I have done that many times.... Just about every office environment.
Mark Heller "Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
Moderator
|
Mark The original post stated; I do not think this is ok, but I do not have any code article to back it up. I am sure many of us have seen outlets damaged from being placed face up. That does not change the fact they are allowable and no inspector should be turning them down. It's strictly a design choice. Bob
Bob Badger Construction & Maintenance Electrician Massachusetts
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,932 Likes: 34
Member
|
If this is in a school it won't usually be the regular muni inspector looking at it. Around here the board of education has it's own inspector and their own rules. I see a little kid sitting there kicking that plug until something happens. Even if it passes the inspection I bet you will be back ... but I guess that is another job. You gotta eat too
Greg Fretwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
Member
|
Bob, I don't think I am alone in thinking it is a bad idea... And I think any Inspector worth his salt should pull out his "Subject to Physical Damage" punk card under the circumstances. In case you hadn't noticed the orginal poster also didn't think it was a good idea, and not his choice of design either. Seems to be his only chance IMO.
Mark Heller "Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
Moderator
|
Mark did you see me say I think it is a great idea? What I can not agree with is the inspector failing it. That would be inconsistent with standard trade practices. It is a very common installation and IMO an inspector would be on shaky ground to fail it. Heck even 'electure' is not seeing a violation and he is fairly conservative. We install hundreds of outlets in the floors of department stores, as soon as the cap is removed it is lost. As soon as a lamp or other display is plugged in it is a trip hazard and may 'light up' under someones foot. It is just a result of needing electricity where there are no walls. Pendant drops are not an option. Would you rather the outlet was not installed and they run cords across the floor? Of course the installer can always refuse to do the work. JMO, Bob
Bob Badger Construction & Maintenance Electrician Massachusetts
|
|
|
Posts: 806
Joined: October 2004
|
|
|
|