ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
sparky 6
Recent Posts
2017 NEC Changes
by sparky. 12/17/17 08:46 AM
Holiday Wishes to all!!
by HotLine1. 12/15/17 07:20 PM
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 12/15/17 07:15 PM
Casino Wiring methods
by HotLine1. 12/09/17 10:44 AM
Ground wire Size to water Line.
by HotLine1. 12/05/17 12:11 PM
New in the Gallery:
Gallery Test
Popular Topics(Views)
243,088 Are you busy
179,529 Re: Forum
170,443 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 12 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#60870 - 01/11/06 03:45 PM Bidding  
mshaw  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44
Fairborn, Oh, USA
How do you feel about competively bidding jobs with a number not to exceed and than performing the work on a T&M basis. I have used this with several sub-contractors at my facility with good results. In my side business I done this as well on several jobs and it is well recieved by my clients and profitable for me. The subs seem to like it as they feel with T&M they can not loose and I win becouse the not to exceed numbers must fall within the buditary parameters that are set up for the project.What experiences have you had?


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#60871 - 01/11/06 05:19 PM Re: Bidding  
Radar  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 349
Los Angeles, CA
First let me say hello, and welcome to the board.

I've never been convinced that mixing T&M and competitive bid is a great idea. I'll try to explain:

In T&M work, the owner bears more risk but (sometimes) saves some money, i.e. - if the job goes well. On the other hand, in bid work, the contractor bears the risk of how the job goes. So it's a matter of who bears risk, and who reaps the reward for that risk.

In the case where a contractor offers a bid price as an NTE (not to exceed) and then works T&M up to the NTE point, the owner reaps some monitary benifet if the job goes well, and the contractor receives less than his bid amount.

If the job does not go well, the contractor still has the risk, and all of a sudden it's a firm fixed price deal.

Bidding work is the same as taking risk, and if the job goes well, the profit is the contractors reward. Why would he agree upfront to give some of it away?

Offering a price estimate (different than a firm fixed price bid) and then doing straight T&M work is OK, but the NTE part only serves to shift potential risk to the contractor, and shift potential rewards to the owner.

Just my thoughts,
Radar


There are 10 types of people. Those who know binary, and those who don't.

#60872 - 01/11/06 06:46 PM Re: Bidding  
mahlere  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
New Jersey
radar,

i agree 100%. If i'm going to agree to a NTE price, and then do it T&M, I lose either way.

Come in under the NTE and I make less money, run over the NTE and I don't get any more money. I get screwed either way.

I'll do T&M, I'll do Fixed Price, but mixing the two just won't work for me.


#60873 - 01/11/06 06:54 PM Re: Bidding  
Dnkldorf  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,064
nowhere usa
I concur with the above 2 posts....


Dnk...


#60874 - 01/11/06 07:44 PM Re: Bidding  
frankft  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39
Maine
You could mix the 2 but only like this. T & M and a do not exceed, BUT if you come in under the NTE price, then you split the difference with the owner. IE: NTE price $1000, comes in T & M at $800, owner pays $900. Owner has a fixed price, they may save some money, and the contractor gets a little extra for the risk they are taking.


Thats how we do it up in the woods!

#60875 - 01/12/06 09:38 AM Re: Bidding  
mahlere  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
New Jersey
frank,

we take risks every day. why would you want to give up any reward?

just go with the fixed price and reap all the reward, or go straight T&M and release all the risk.

with your scenerio, you are still taking all the risk, but only reaping part of the reward. The customer releases all risk, but still reaps some of the reward.

Because in your scenerio, if it comes out to $1100, does the customer split your loss with you?

so why split your gains with them?


#60876 - 01/12/06 11:17 AM Re: Bidding  
Radar  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 349
Los Angeles, CA
Ditto Mahlere - in simplest terms, by doing this, virtually all the risk is shifted to the contractor and at least some of the reward is shifted to the owner.

We do use NTE values here in very specific cases. I'm not running my own business here, I work for a large public agency in the Los Angeles area. Sometimes, when trying to negotiate for a needed change to an existing contract, we reach a stalemate where and are unable to agree up front ahead of time. So, sometimes in these cases we will direct the contractor to proceed with the change work, keep T&M records, and establish a NTE value for the work. The contractor is then to proceed, keep track of the daily cost of the work, and to notify us when they reach 80% of the NTE value, and then to STOP WORK when they reach the NTE. We will reevaluate the change at that point.

Of course it doesn't always work out as smoothly as that, but the idea here is to lay out a path forward, put a cap on the cost of the work, but not place additional risk on the contractor.

It's all about RISK / REWARD.

Radar


There are 10 types of people. Those who know binary, and those who don't.

#60877 - 01/12/06 12:50 PM Re: Bidding  
mahlere  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
New Jersey
you sir, are a gentleman and a scholar :-)



Member Spotlight
Scott35
Scott35
Anaheim, CA. USA
Posts: 2,708
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7943 MB (Peak: 0.9535 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-12-17 19:42:41 UTC