Quote:
"No, a high impedance grounding system would not be a fault since it is intended to operate that way."
Re-read my post. I was referring to unintentional grounds; specifically those involving conductors whose current flow is only limited by the impedance of the soil they lay in.
Quote:
"Notice that an open would not fall into this definition and should not be referred to as a fault."
This got me to thinking about the example I referred to above. We once had a 7200 volt line down that didn't trip the breaker in the substation. We put an ammeter in the metering circuit and could not get a descernable reading. So even though the line was physically in contact with the earth, it was technically an open circuit.
A fault or not?
On the other hand, I've seen a damaged underground 240 volt feed to a barn spin the KWH meter like a helicopter, but never trip its' breaker because the earths' impedance kept the current below it's trip point.
So let's look at one other example (just to play devils' advocate). The 240 volt heating element (4500 watt)in a hot water heater loses its insulation at precisely the midway point of the heating element. Since each half of the element is is now at half voltage (120 to ground through the tank) through one half the resistance, the current flow has not changed and the water still heats. Is it a fault?