ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Recent Posts
Question on power to 4 Nema 6-50 & 5 Nema 5-15.
by TrickedoutTech. 10/23/17 07:37 PM
300 watt transformer
by watersparkfalls. 10/23/17 05:23 PM
VFD MotorFeeders
by Yoopersup. 10/22/17 07:52 PM
Generator Cable Sizing
by brsele. 10/18/17 07:39 PM
What do you do?
by gfretwell. 10/17/17 01:08 AM
New in the Gallery:
Gallery Test
Popular Topics(Views)
241,467 Are you busy
177,469 Re: Forum
169,034 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (ramsy), 25 guests, and 12 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#53989 - 07/13/05 09:11 PM Respirators  
straightedge  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 86
Mesa, AZ
Was wearing a respirator on my job last week because the painters were painting the roof deck in a Bassett Furniture show room.

OSHA came on the job because of an accident that caused a death.

Got busted because me and my crew were not properly trained on how to clean, store, and wear the respirator. Also need to perform a seet test with a hood and use a chemical to make sure there are no leaks. Also need to have a phisical with your doctor to make sure your lungs are strong enough to use a respirator.

The rubber band masks would of been fine to use even though you could still smell the paint.


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#53990 - 07/13/05 09:32 PM Re: Respirators  
renosteinke  Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
Blue Collar Country
This was a mis-application of a rule that applies to breathing devices, such as the "Scott air-pac", and such. I hope you were not issued a formal citation. It sounds like you were trying to do 'the right thing.'

Your defense is to show that you complied with the manufacturers' instructions, and that the equipment was appropriate for the hazard.

OSHA leans very heavily toward "training" and "documentation" citations- they're so much easier to issue! And, when there's an injury (or complaint), there is a real desire to generate paper as a way to show the "did their job."

I was on a job where a guy got very- and I mean very- badly cut by a piece of sheet metal. I was frankly amazed he made it across the plant without dying first. The next day, when the inspectors came, there was still the blood trail- looked like a painted line- wherever he had gone. As you might guess, this got the foreman in a bit of trouble.
As soon as the inspectors left, we had a "safety meeting." The new rule: If you get cut- DON'T BLEED ON THE FLOOR! Yes, he was serious- but we couldn't keep from laughing anyway!


#53991 - 07/13/05 09:47 PM Re: Respirators  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
John,
If they were wearing respirators and not nuisance dust masks the citation is correct. The same rules apply to respirators as to supplied air devices such as SCBA.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

#53992 - 07/13/05 10:47 PM Re: Respirators  
macmikeman  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 717
Honolulu, Hawaii
Sole proprietorship. There is no employer- employee relationship. This loosen's OSHA's noose alot. I got this strait from an OSHA big whip who was giving a seminar in our area once. He did not really want to answer my question about are OSHA rules applicable to sole prop's who have no employee's, but finally said if no employer-employee relationship exists, then they have no juristiction.


#53993 - 07/14/05 09:18 AM Re: Respirators  
Mike Wescoatt  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 161
Cedar City, Utah
Where I worked last this is how we applied the rule... If you were required to work in a place where a respirator was needed to protect you then you were required to have the seal test and "huff" testing, as well as the proper respirator provided to you. On the other hand if the conditions didn't warrant (read "below acceptable concentration / time limits") then it was the employee's option to wear one or not and the employeer didn't have to provide the equipment. Training was required in either case and if you weren't required to wear one you could still get the seal and huff test done.

Perhaps a little too loose after reading 1910.134.a.2 and 1910.134.c.2.


Mike Wescoatt

#53994 - 07/14/05 12:22 PM Re: Respirators  
gfretwell  Online Content


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,124
Estero,Fl,usa
I think this is just an indication of how OSHA works. They don't do much inspecting until there is an accident and then everyone gets a ticket.
That was the context of the "hard hat expiration" message I posted. It is one more ticket they can write when they start running out of things to cite. The term the OSHA road show guy used was "piling on" the fines when they are spanking a contractor with an injury/death.


Greg Fretwell

#53995 - 07/14/05 04:42 PM Re: Respirators  
Hazmat  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 30
IA
You must supply a copy of 29CFR1910.134, Appendix D to any employee whom you "allow" to wear a respirator, if it's done for employee comfort rather than in response to an air quality problem.

Basically, this Appendix explains their rights and the risks to wearing a respirator. It's not that big a deal, but to cover yourself completely, make sure you do this.



Member Spotlight
renosteinke
renosteinke
Blue Collar Country
Posts: 5,316
Joined: January 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.7867 MB (Peak: 0.9412 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-10-24 02:11:21 UTC