ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Unusual Well Pump Switch Failure
by sabrown - 10/28/20 04:31 PM
Look at this mess...
by InspectorE - 10/27/20 09:09 PM
New tool
by gfretwell - 10/24/20 11:09 AM
Where is Everyone?
by Bill Addiss - 10/17/20 07:04 PM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 17 guests, and 21 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Standard vs Optional Calculation #47480 01/17/05 04:52 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 49
G
GamecockEE Offline OP
Member
Just wanted to see what the most popular method is for calculating the service load for residential installations, the standard or optional. It seems to me that the standard calculation is more conservative. Has that been your experience out there?

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation #47481 01/17/05 06:28 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 182
B
Bob Offline
Member
There are requirements t hat must be met listed in 220.30A before you can use the optional method. You project may not meet the requirements.

[This message has been edited by Bob (edited 01-17-2005).]

Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation #47482 01/17/05 09:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 437
The Watt Doctor Offline
Member
Hey EE,
I've done it both ways in the past. I'm not sure what you mean by [e]conservative[/e], but I've found that most of the time the standard calculation results in a larger service. I haven't done any of these calculations, with the exception of my own house, in years. I used the standard calculation on my house. It seems like there were a few times when the optional method resulted in a larger service, but not very often.

Wattologically Yours,
Doc


The Watt Doctor
Altura Cogen
Channelview, TX
Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation #47483 01/17/05 10:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator
As an inspector, I never see the standard method used. My experience is the same as Doc's, which is that the optional method results in a smaller service/feeder.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation #47484 01/18/05 09:24 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 49
G
GamecockEE Offline OP
Member
What I meant by conservative is that the calculated service size would be larger using the standard method vs the optional method. From the perspective of a practicing EE who worries about liability issues, and often not knowing exactly what the appliance and heating/air cond. ratings are, or how they might get changed during the construction phase, it seemed prudent to me to use the more conservative method, better safe than sorry. I wanted to see which method the experience base out there is using.

Re: Standard vs Optional Calculation #47485 01/19/05 12:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 437
The Watt Doctor Offline
Member
Practicing EE,
Looks like we are on the same page.
Regards,
Doc


The Watt Doctor
Altura Cogen
Channelview, TX

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
BEAMEUP
BEAMEUP
WA
Posts: 27
Joined: December 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
271,051 Are you busy
205,040 Re: Forum
193,164 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3