ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 142 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#42453 09/21/04 08:26 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19
J
Member
A commercial client wants to convert his incandescent exterior lighting (mounted on building) to HID. In theory, the energy savings will pay back the cost of the changeover in a few years. I have heard from several contractors that the life of HID lamps is often much shorter than advertized. Due to the cost of relamping, this would significantly extend the payback period. I would appreciate the comments of others with first hand expereince in this area.

#42454 09/21/04 09:16 AM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,443
Likes: 3
Member
jsherrard,
Welcome to ECN!. [Linked Image]
HID lighting in general would make a better option than an incandescent source, any day.
A standard Metal Halide lamp will give 15, 000 Hrs of light and a SON lamp will give up to 20,000 Hrs.
Also, a HID lamp is generally more robust when it comes to vibration and voltage surges.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5