ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Recent Posts
Al Hildenbrand - Minneapolis - obituary
by Bill Addiss - 02/03/23 07:38 PM
by renosteinke - 01/27/23 09:52 PM
Does NEC 551.71 (F) apply to dwellings?
by BigB - 01/20/23 10:46 AM
Power submeter connections
by HotLine1 - 01/19/23 09:09 AM
New in the Gallery:
Burger King crown sillyness
Burger King crown sillyness
by wa2ise, December 11
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 129 guests, and 25 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#38410 05/22/04 01:00 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 449
Fred Offline OP
I know a lot of you guys/gals have probably ran into this set-up before but last week was the first time for me. Old 2 story house with a light in the downstairs dining room controlled by 2 3-way switches. Switch(es) have gone bad and the light can't be turned on. I remove a switch and find there are no markings to identify any terminal as common. Can't ring out a switch because they show no continuity between any terminals in any switch position. Each switch box contains 3 cloth covered wires- red, white and black. The white wire is a grounded conductor, the black is hot and the red rings out as a traveler between the boxes. I figure the only way to hook this up to 2 new 3-way switches is to connect the "traveler" to the common terminals and the hot/neutral wires matched up to the traveler terminals. It worked but I am at a loss as to why anyone would choose such a complicated 3-way set-up. I figure that in one switch position the neutral is broken to the light and in the other position the hot is broken. Can anybody offer any insight to this wiring method?

#38411 05/22/04 01:56 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 169
I recall my Dad speaking of this set-up. I seem to remember that he called it "hot travelers". Illegal then as now.

#38412 05/22/04 02:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 650
'Hot' travellers are not a problem. Switches are supposed to be on the 'hot' side of the load.

The problem is that this circuit switches the neutral. Depending upon the switch position, the screw shell of the lamp holder will be energized.


#38413 05/22/04 05:55 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 697
I'm not quite following your language, Fred, but Jon is right, if you are switching the neutral, it's a dangerous situation.

I have run into this situation many times with old varnished-cambic wires. I'll try to explain how I repair it.

I remove both switches and do continuity tests (power off)to find the two travellers. You can't relie on the wires color coding because often the white wire is really a switched power wire. Often you can identify the power going into one of the switches if it ties in with other power wires. The switched power wire to the light can easily also be found with a continuity tester (power off, light removed). With proper safety gear you can also energize the circuit and find the power wire with a volt-meter. The travellers and light-power wire will be de-energized since the switches are removed. Once you've found the travellers and commons (incoming power on one switch, and out-going light wire on the other), the reassembly is simple.

I usually tape all the wires as this type of insulation is inferior, especially at the lights, where the heat of the lamp makes the insulation brittle.


#38414 05/22/04 07:02 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 449
Fred Offline OP
Dave, Re-read my post. There is only one traveler and hot and neutral on both ends. You cannot make the light come on from jumpering wires on one end. It's not at all wired like any acceptable 3-way configurations. I am aware that it is wrong now as it has been for the last 70 years. It can't be fixed without ripping out a 14' plaster and lath ceiling and part of a wall. I was just wondering if anyone else runs into this and if it was common practice in years gone by. They used to fuse the neutral in houses of this era. Was that ever considered proper?

#38415 05/22/04 07:36 PM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 552
Does it resemble anything like this?

[Linked Image from]

#38416 05/22/04 11:47 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 597
Nice graphic Donnie.

I just worked on that very same circuit today.

It's important to remember that this was a legal circuit at the beginning of the 1900s. Polarization of the lampholder happened about 15 - 20 years into the century. Putting the switch in the neutral was stopped about the same time.

A lot of dwellings were built with code compliant original installations that get grandfathered in now, even though the circuit is recognized as hazardous now.

Al Hildenbrand
#38417 05/23/04 04:34 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 198
We call this a hot 3 way here in the northeast. Most common place to encounter this set up is at older dairy farms.
This is so the farmer can turn on flood lights at his house and barn at the same time. A sw is at the house,and one sw at the barn.

Shoot first, apologize later.....maybe
#38418 05/23/04 04:34 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 697
If this diagram in txsparky's post is correctly indicating your situation, all I could suggest is to install a wall-sconce above either or both switches (fish a short wire from the switch to the re-work box above).


Link Copied to Clipboard

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC Now Available!
* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman


Member Spotlight
Alan Belson
Alan Belson
Mayenne N. France
Posts: 1,803
Joined: March 2005
Top Posters(30 Days)
triple 3
Popular Topics(Views)
303,220 Are you busy
232,212 Re: Forum
216,956 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5