ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photos of the Week:

Meter vs Bricklayer
Meter vs Bricklayer

Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 274 guests, and 27 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#221873 08/27/22 11:28 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,476
Likes: 3
Cat Servant
Member
As I re-enter the trade I am taking a close look at the changes made to the NEC in the past few cycles.
Ryan Jackson has some excellent YouTube videos that n the topic, including some be focused on accessible attics.
320.23 adds wire protection requirements based solely on whether the attic is accessed by a permanently installed ladder. Sounds reasonable, doesn’t it?
Except . . .
The house I own has an attic. There is a permanently installed folding ladder. The code seems to presume that the attic will be used for storage. I’d agree, save for two more details:
1) The pitch of the roof is so low that most can’t even sit in the hatch without bumping your head; and,
2) with the furnace closet right next to the attic hatch, the area around the opening is completely filled with ductwork and vent pipes. You’re not getting in that attic unless you’re a cat.

Therefore I maintain that the code has reached too far. What are your thoughts?

Horizontal Ad
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 384
H
Member
Sounds like you have little need to get up in there much. Can I simply suggest you remove the ladder smile

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 35
L
Member
Note that in 320.23, for AC cable run across the top of the floor joists, an accessible attic is one that has either a permanently installed ladder or stairs, or one that requires a portable ladder. Each of these two scenarios has different protection requirements.
The question is if access is blocked by permanently installed equipment/ducts, etc., is the attic considered accessible anymore. I'd think - purely opinion - that If a human can't even get in there to hoist something through the attic opening without dismantling permanent stuff, it would not be considered accessible. On the other hand, if people can access the attic opening and hoist things into it even if they can't climb into the attic, then the protection requirements for a portable ladder would be applicable. All of this does raise some questions about when the wiring was installed, how was it installed, and how was it inspected.

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 35
L
Member
Forgot to add. I don't think the requirements are unreasonable for accessible attics. Think about hoisting a box through the attic opening and blindly pushing it along the floor. Could tug a cable if it's not protected as per 320.23.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,006
Likes: 37
G
Member
It is not a ridiculous rule and I would call it like I saw it. Areas really inaccessible would get a break but if it is possible that they will be crawling around, it would need the cable protection. I would counter that crawling around is worse than having a stand up attic.


Greg Fretwell

Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!
 

Member Spotlight
Alan Belson
Alan Belson
Mayenne N. France
Posts: 1,803
Joined: March 2005
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
352,283 Are you busy
276,058 Re: Forum
255,598 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5