ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Run Cap subsitution question. Two vs. one
by LarryC - 05/20/22 09:01 PM
It's been an interesting career
by Marienauripod - 05/18/22 07:37 PM
Material shortages???
by NORCAL - 05/02/22 04:12 PM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 19 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 10
G
Member
... when they moved good old table 310.16 that has been around since electricity that they changed the ampacity of 14ga and 12ga in the 60c column? (Table 310.15(B)(16) now)

Or am I just missing something?
It is insignificant in regular branch circuits because of 240.4(D) but that will affect motor circuits.
I am a bit ashamed it took me 4 years to see that (the 14 was actually only adopted here this year) but I am retired and not looking at this every day.


Greg Fretwell
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with these Exam Prep Combos:
 

>> Master Electrician Exam Prep     >> JourneyMan Electrician Exam Prep
 

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 26
L
Member
Changes were made in the 2011 NEC. Found the following explanation (extracted from a longer article about the 2011 changes).


"The ampacity of some conductors in Table 310.15(B)(16) (formerly 310.16) didn’t match those found in the Canadian Electrical Code and were therefore changed. While no technical evidence was submitted showing insulation failure of the conductors, this proposal was passed. The end result was a change to the ampacities of:

Copper conductors: 14, 12, 3, and 1 AWG, and 600kcmil, 1,500kcmil and 2,000kcmil.

Aluminum conductors: 12, 8, and 6 AWG, and 300kcmil, 700kcmil, and 800kcmil."


Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 10
G
Member
I am really surprised I didn't hear much about that. It certainly changes the answer to that question on the inspector test about a 120v 1HP motor with 14ga wire.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 5
Member
Greg:

No, you are not alone on this. I just ‘discovered’ this today. (Frown)



John
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 10
G
Member
Like I say, this certainly throws a monkey wrench into what you can do in motor circuits. I keep thinking there is an exception I haven't found. I got my CEUs online 4 years ago based on the 11 code and I do not remember this being brought up. I did know 310.16 was moved but I never heard it was changed. That is the problem with being retired. I am not really paying that much attention these days. I didn't even renew my license last year so I didn't take the 14 updates. I really miss the face to face classes tho. I am sure the seminar guys were talking about this.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,390
S
Member
Proof old dogs rule Greg

go you!

~S~


Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
RonKipperDatacom
RonKipperDatacom
Kansas City, KS
Posts: 30
Joined: January 2013
Top Posters(30 Days)
LarryC 3
NORCAL 2
Popular Topics(Views)
291,290 Are you busy
223,801 Re: Forum
209,213 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5