ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (gfretwell), 32 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#21911 02/12/03 07:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10
I
Member
I have a house that is a pre-fab, the main feeds were ran after the house was put in place and go into j-boxes going to the different circuits. The feeds ( 10-15 of them ) are bundled together using zip-ties and are layed on top of the foundation wall and run the length and width of the house. I have read about the "cabling effect" where NM 14,12 or 10 awg zip-tied together over long distances can sustain a dramatic loss in the amp rating for the circuits involved. Has anybody else heard of this and if so what can you do about it?

Thanks for any posts!

#21912 02/12/03 08:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
You can bundle cables togther, but you will have to derate as shown by 310.15(B)(2)(a)

You said 10-15 cables, I figure 12 2 wire circuits makes 24 current carrying conductors, derate to 45% so

240.4(B) allows next standard OCPD

#14 = 11.25 amps Still on 15 amp breaker
#12 = 13.5 amps now on 15 amp breaker
#10 = 18 amps now on 20 amp breaker

I have added the following:

Curt pointed out (see below)I was wrong with the application of 240.B, going up to the next standard breaker is prohibited for outlet circuits which some of these are likely to be.

In this case the #14 and #12 would be on 10 amp OCPDs and the # 10s on 15 amp OCPD


[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 02-15-2003).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#21913 02/13/03 01:40 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10
I
Member
iwire;

Thanks much for the reply and calculations. I'll check out the allowed limits and see if there is a way to fan these runs out either way. I'd like my system to be as efficient and safe as possible, but I'll take what I can get!

Thanks Again!

Ian

#21914 02/13/03 05:16 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 375
G
Member
ikauffma ----

Before you go and do a lot of work...

The concern is heat damage to the wires not some interaction that will cause a drop an ampicity.

If the wires have been there for any length of time and there are no obvious heat related problems, don't go looking for one.

I suspect that the wires will not get any hotter the way they are bundled than a wire in a foam insulated wall.

#21915 02/13/03 06:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
George,
Most inspectors in my area would pick up on 10 to 15 romex bundled and ask for it to be seperated or show them the derating.

Whether or not you beleive it to be a problem, it is the code.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#21916 02/14/03 02:45 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 558
C
Member
Iwire,
Don't forget that 240.4(B) does not permit using the next higher standard overcurrent device if the conductors are part of a multioutlet branch circuit supplying receptacles for cord and plug connected loads.

Curt

[This message has been edited by caselec (edited 02-14-2003).]


Curt Swartz
#21917 02/14/03 02:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 375
G
Member
iwire ---

This appears to be an existing situation that does not require inspection.

I believe the question was concerned with waste of electricity no code compliance. That is why my answer was different than yours.

Consider the following:

We have a 120v subpanel with a 20amp main breaker. The panel has 10 20amp circuits. All of the circuits are run through 1 6" conduit.

The perscriptive code requires the conductors be derated. I agree that the code and the inspector would require derating. But derating is foolish in this case.

#21918 02/15/03 12:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Curt,
The circuits were not described in detail so to do any calculations I had to make some assumptions in my post I figured 12, 2 wire circuits, if he has some multiwire circuits it might help him, as for each 2 circuits on multiwire you lose 2 current carrying conductors (the neutrals). I did not bother to figure all the options.

George,
When some one asks a question here I assume they want an answer as far as code, in this particular case there should not be any heating unless most or all the cables are fully loaded which is probably not going to happen, as in your example it could not happen, but whether or not you or I believe it to be a problem it's still a violation that could be failed by an inspector.

That said, I know there is a real world out there, and this kind of installation is not that uncommon

Thanks Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#21919 02/15/03 01:40 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 558
C
Member
Bob

I was referring to multioutlet circuits not multiwire circuits. Since most circuits in a dwelling are multioutlet circuits you can not use the next higher standard size overcurrent protections device.

Curt


Curt Swartz
#21920 02/15/03 01:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Curt, thanks now I got it, so it would be

#14 = 11.25 amps now on 10 amp OCPD
#12 = 13.5 amps now on 10 amp OCPD
#10 = 18 amps now on 15 amp OCPD

I will make note of this on my first post.

Bob



[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 02-15-2003).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5