ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Featured:

 Electrical
 Clearance

 *
 Tools
 *

 Books

 *

 Test Equipment

 

Advertisement:-Left

AE-Gifts, Affordable Everyday

Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 340 guests, and 28 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#216947 03/18/16 01:51 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 203
T
triple Offline OP
Member
Since most large switchboards placed along a wall tend to be positioned at least a few inches off/away from said wall, does the code allow foreign equipment to be mounted within this gap and under 6' above the electrical equipment? Tecnically, nothing placed within this gap would be within the "footprint" of the gear. Obviously, at some point, the gap does become large enough for other trades to use. Is it one inch, three inches, one foot? Can the AHJ say that even 18" isn't enough?

Horizontal Ad
triple #216948 03/18/16 03:12 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 984
Likes: 2
G
Member
Check with your AHJ.
I know that although Chicago says no (because they prohibit foreign items within the footprint and the associated working space); it is allowed in other cities.


Ghost307
triple #216954 03/19/16 12:37 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 203
T
triple Offline OP
Member
The working space is only in front of the type of equipment I am referring to. For equipment requiring working space behind it, the unit would not be allowed to be placed up against a wall. Sorry, I don't think I described the situation very clearly.

triple #216956 03/19/16 11:10 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 984
Likes: 2
G
Member
I really think the AHJ needs to weigh in on this.
A drain line behind the equipment will cause few problems, a water line could sweat or break, a gas line is a hazard next to electrical equipment.
You also have to consider how you would repair/replace something that is rendered inaccessible after installation.
The 2 of you need to go over the specifics of this installation...I doubt that there is a universal answer to this.


Ghost307
triple #216957 03/19/16 12:53 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 203
T
triple Offline OP
Member
1) The area I am referring to is above the equipment, within six feet vertically of its top, but behind the footprint. If the equipment were 6' from the wall instead of 4" then there would definately be no problem with anything foreign being installed there.
2) Nothing is rendered inaccessible. Again, I must not have described the scenario well. Nothing has been placed directly behind the switchgear. It it above but behind the footprint.

triple #216970 03/21/16 08:34 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 21
A
Member
The way 110.26(E) is worded, there would be nothing prohibiting what you describe. The AHJ can always choose to rule differently.

triple #216976 03/22/16 08:57 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 9
Member
IMHO, it would depend on the proposed 'foreign' item is. Any 'item' that may 'leak' or cause any type of damage to the gear would be a "No", unless protection of the gear could be maintained.

The best solution to your inquiry would be a discussion with the local AHJ.


John
Horizontal Ad
triple #216977 03/22/16 09:57 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 984
Likes: 2
G
Member
Agreed.
I had a major switchgear installation where the Contractor took a short cut and routed the incoming natural gas line over the gear.
His response to the AHJ's objection was to put a drip pan underneath the gas pipe.

As the old adage goes...you can't fix stupid.


Ghost307

Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right
Member Spotlight
NickD
NickD
Amish Country, PA
Posts: 46
Joined: March 2013
Top Posters(30 Days)
dsk 1
Popular Topics(Views)
561,458 Are you busy
435,120 Re: Forum
403,927 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5