ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
12 Lead Motor Connection Weird
by emolatur - 01/19/22 02:40 PM
Any women electricians here?
by gfretwell - 01/17/22 01:44 PM
Well There's your problem.
by gfretwell - 01/08/22 12:17 AM
Happy New Year!!
by HotLine1 - 01/04/22 09:50 AM
Sangamo s309.2
by Robski - 12/31/21 04:54 PM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 40 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 136
C
cgw Offline OP
Member
The load calculated for a (480X208) transformer for multifamily using the optional method (220.84)is significantly smaller than the load calculated using the regular method. It is close but it would allow a smaller transformer (750 vs. 1000).
Are there any disadvantages going with the smaller size?

The advantages are smaller physical size and heat output.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,288
Likes: 4
Member
This is a design issue. Are you refering to the POCO xfr?? Our utility co's here routinely install 'small' transformers (13.2 to 480/13.2 to 120/208) on their supply side.

That said, do you have any capacity for future expansion, if you opt for the smaller unit that you reference as 'close'?

IMHO, a good design would allow for future capacity, unless this resi is being built with no possibility for any significant future electrical requirements. (Such as resi apts)



John
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,677
Likes: 9
G
Member
I assumed he was talking about a customer owned transformer.
This may be a Scott question.
At say 600 KVA, is a 1000 KVA more efficient than a 750 (less heat)
I also guess there are higher efficiency transformers for a few extra bucks.
I don't "spec" them I only know how to inspect them wink


Greg Fretwell
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 984
Likes: 1
G
Member
The downside that I could see would be if the actual load turned out to be the higher value and you have to go back and replace everything (on your nickel).
If push came to shove, all that the customer's attorney would have to do is point out that the value determined in the Code was indeed greater than the one that you used and claim that you 'cherry picked' another calculation method that let you use the cheapest transformer.

On the other side of the coin, transformers will handle a larger load than they are nameplated at for brief periods of time and you might be okay based on the load profile of the building...but if everyone starts cooking and turns up their thermostats on the same cold winter day you might be up the proverbial creek.


Ghost307
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,412
Likes: 3
Member
CGW,
I would never under-spec something like a transformer, especially where it has multiple loads on it, as you state.
You always need a certain amount of operating capacity in a transformer, over and above what your maximum demand calcs tell you, to make sure you don't cause it to overheat or indeed over-saturate.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 136
C
cgw Offline OP
Member
Thanks for the input.
The question concerns a dry type transformer in the building (the service is 480V and the transformer is for a feeder that serves all the apartments and the 120/208 house loads).
One of the main questions is - do we trust the 220.84 calculation when it is significantly higher than the 220.40 calculation?
Including house load:
220.40 - 945 KVA
220.84 - 664 KVA
750KVA transformer or 1000KVA transformer?

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,288
Likes: 4
Member
IMHO, 220.40 would be my choice.

1000KVA transformer.

(Keep in mind that it will all come back to the design professional, in the event of any issues)

Last edited by HotLine1; 11/13/13 03:43 PM.

John
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
J
JBD Offline
Member
Several years ago the US government passed an 'Energy Act'. One of the most visible outcomes was the 'killing off' of incandescent lamps, another was the requirement that small power transformers (e.g. non-utility installations) be designed with 'ideal' efficiency at 35% loading.

So a 1000kVA transformer would be most efficient at 350kVA, but it may still be less efficient than a 350kVA unit loaded to 100%.

Have you done a loss (cost of ownership) analysis yet?





Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 947
T
twh Offline
Member
Smaller transformers require smaller wire and possibly equipment.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
T
Member
The step-wise introduction of LEDs and less consumptive PCs...now replaced by laptops... means that you would go small.

You're burning kW even at idle. The rare heavy loads can be sustained for hours on end for such transformers.

Be certain that ventilation is good and pure. If it is not so then you have to go large.

You would not believe how hot some e-rooms get because the design disregarded heat-rejection from a dry-type transformer.


Last edited by Tesla; 11/16/13 04:44 PM.

Tesla
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Posts: 362
Joined: April 2003
Top Posters(30 Days)
grich 1
Popular Topics(Views)
288,107 Are you busy
220,210 Re: Forum
206,191 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5