ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
UL 508A SPACING
by ale348 - 03/29/24 01:09 AM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 376 guests, and 15 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
T
Member
In California Title 24 extensively covers all manner of lighting and the switching thereof.

So, they are covered by the Building Code -- just not the National Electrical Code.

It's not enough to just know the NEC. There are many, many, Code requirements that affect electrical installations that are driven by non-electrical safetly considerations.

Parking lot illumination is but one of the many.

Such complexity is why residential electricians normally lose their shirts when shifting over to commercial jobs. (And vice versa.)


Tesla
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 43
Member
keeping in mind the various requirements of code and title 24 is the city's own requirements, many times a specific city may go over and beyond any code or ordinance not necessarily the state minimum requirement.

Checking with the city you're planning to work within is very important as well, unless the details are spec'd out on a city approved stamped print.

Last edited by MarkPerry; 09/22/13 10:53 PM.

Anyone claiming to know everything about Electrical, is wrong.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 46
Member
Lovely thread here, over 4 years in the making... dunno

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Revived by someone in '12 and revived again by a new member who was off the subject.


John
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
Originally Posted by HotLine1
Anybody read 210.70 in its entirety?

NO, the 'location' of the switch is not spelled out within the NEC, that is design, common sense, good trade practice, etc.; however a switch controlled lighting outlet is required.

The OP did not say resi or comm, but he mentioned a Building Code that deals with egress illumination. IF he is going comm (egress) then 1006 of the Bldg Code specs illumination.



I got into it with an Archy over his desire for a prox detector in parking garage stairwells

210.70B EX2, which allows for automation like proximity detectors

But this was @ a hospital, and i felt that the old folks who move really slow might be left in the dark

~S~

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Sparky:

The stairwells that provide egress are always 24/7 here. Hospital parking decks, mall parking decks, office bldg parking decks. I do not know what 'code' requires it, and I will ask the Bldg guy Thursday when I get back to the office.

Wsa the Archys reasoning to meet Energy Code requirements??


John
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
I'm unsure of energy codes, although it would behoove me to bone up on them HotOne

The particular scenario was 24/7 public access, spec'd out for a lotta T5 vaportights

The whole facility was contactor controlled 208 3ph lighting, with the 3rd leg left on 24/7 as 'night lighting'

There may have been an energy code the Archy had in mind, but he didn't impart it to me, so i put the stairs on the NL circuit there.

My ahj didn't seem to have much of a prob with the change i made, everyone else wanted a piece of me though

~S~




Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
~s~:
FWIW, the T5s for sure work very well into the Energy Code.

IMHO, you made the right move going to the 24/7 circuitry.

Just an FYI for me....who else wanted a piece of you?



John
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
The PM and the owners of the place HotOne

they see it as a waste of energy

i kinda see it as a shield from liability

I didn't ask, but i get the impression (code wise) the ahj would have had to pass it w/prox detection

Butcha know how they fare in a public parking garage.....

I wasn't too popular as Mr design build .....~S~

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Failure of a sensor, falling of a person in the unlit area, will keep a flock of lawyers happy.



John
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5