ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Split Bus Breaker Panel
by gfretwell - 01/28/21 01:00 AM
electircal ageing test on IPC
by quickspark - 01/27/21 08:22 AM
What Does a Ground Rod Do?
by quickspark - 01/26/21 12:38 AM
Floating Ground - device being tested or scope?
by quickspark - 01/26/21 12:36 AM
Ground fault remover :-)
by dsk - 01/24/21 04:35 AM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 19 guests, and 17 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Why we need a longer NEC cycle. #210827 08/08/13 08:55 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,559
G
gfretwell Online Content OP
Member
This is the official explanation of why Florida is on 2008

Quote
The state of Florida is currently under the provisions of the 2008 National Electrical Code as referenced in the 2010 Florida Building Code.



The 2013 FBC, which is based on the 2012 IBC, references the 2011 NEC. The expected effective date of the 2013 FBC / 2011 NEC is March of 2014.



The earliest possible date the 2014 NEC can be adopted will be under the 2016 FBC which is being slated for adoption in March of 2016.


Greg Fretwell
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Re: Why we need a longer NEC cycle. [Re: gfretwell] #210829 08/08/13 09:07 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
harold endean Offline
Member
Greg,

I am sure John will jump in here too. Right now we are under the 2011 NEC and the 2014 will be out shortly. By the time our state reads the 2014 and adopts it might take a year or more. SO we too are always trying to play "catch up" with the newest code. If the code only change say every 5 years, I think that it would be a good thing. There was one code cycle where we were on the 1996 (I think) for more than 5-7 years and there was no problems that I heard of for being so late.

Re: Why we need a longer NEC cycle. [Re: gfretwell] #210830 08/08/13 09:11 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,229
HotLine1 Offline
Member
It's almost time for the CEUs on the upcoming 2014 NEC Changes here in NJ. Not that the State will adopt the '14 with amendments quickly.

Active now is the '11 with amendments, the '08 for Rehab (last I heard) and CEUs on the '14 Changes.

A five year cycle would be good, but it would reduce book sales, and CEU classes, affecting some pocketbooks

Last edited by HotLine1; 08/08/13 09:14 PM.

John
Re: Why we need a longer NEC cycle. [Re: gfretwell] #210832 08/08/13 09:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
harold endean Offline
Member
John,

I just got my first letter today asking me to sign up for my 10 hour CEU class. Even though the 2014 hasn't even come out yet. smile

Re: Why we need a longer NEC cycle. [Re: gfretwell] #210834 08/08/13 09:23 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,229
HotLine1 Offline
Member
Yes, the letters will be flooding the mailboxes!

Like I hinted, a longer cycle will hurt their pockets.

I get at least 2-3 emails from NFPA that the '14 should be available 12/15/13 and "Order Early" & save xx%. Sounds like one of those 'TV Only' deals.


John
Re: Why we need a longer NEC cycle. [Re: gfretwell] #210847 08/12/13 08:00 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
harold endean Offline
Member
The code making system does seem to make a lot of money for many people. Code books, new manufacturing products, classes, etc. Granted we all just want to make people safer with electricity, but sometimes it seems like they change a section of the code over and over again. Like bonding of pools. Also we can't change human nature and we can't fix stupid. I still think a 5 year code cycle would be better than 3 year.

Re: Why we need a longer NEC cycle. [Re: harold endean] #210851 08/12/13 10:30 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,335
S
sparkyinak Offline
Member
Don't forget we living in a super fast pace world now and the code has been around since a slower pace in time


"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
Re: Why we need a longer NEC cycle. [Re: gfretwell] #210852 08/12/13 11:46 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,559
G
gfretwell Online Content OP
Member
The world may run at a faster pace but governments still plod along. It is pure bureaucracy and the fact that IBC and NFPA are on different cycles that keep Florida at least 3 years behind the NEC code cycle.
Even if the AHJ adopts the code right away, proposals close before you actually have a lot of experience with that version and it means the political arm is adopting a code into law before they actually have a chance to read and understand it. (as if they actually read laws before they pass them anyway)


Greg Fretwell
Re: Why we need a longer NEC cycle. [Re: gfretwell] #210858 08/12/13 05:00 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,335
S
sparkyinak Offline
Member
Tru dat on all accounts!


"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
Re: Why we need a longer NEC cycle. [Re: gfretwell] #210861 08/12/13 07:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member
I note that there is absolutely no provision for anyone to propose any changes to the code cycle.

Let's face the truth: the NEC is in the hands of a handful of paid folks, who are bound to do their employers; bidding. Who else can attend the conventions? Who else can even introduce such a change? Unless you're part of NFPA management, your opinion just has no bearing. period.

NFPA members sure don't have any say. I spent years as a member, and watched the NFPA take all manner of organizational positions- without even once consulting with the membership. Heck, I never even heard from the "committee" I was supposedly part of, and my letters went unanswered.

Market forces? Why do you think the NFPA has worked so hard to isolate themselves from any market accountability?

The only thing that threatens them is political action. Hence, the intensive lobbying every cycle for everyone to immediately accept the newest version, complete and unamended. Hence, the endless efforts to get other NFPA codes accepted as law - and their rabid opposition to public ownership of "their" laws.

Heck, we could roll the code back to 1960 with little ill effect. After all, what has changed? GFCI's? Ufer's? What else?

I'll bet we can do just fine without the recent (2005?) addition of a requirement that there be a phone jack in a house. One wonders how we got along for a century of home phones without there being that legal requirement?

They'll stop writing new codes when we stop using them.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
cookcc
cookcc
California ,Long Beach
Posts: 28
Joined: May 2007
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Trumpy 18
NORCAL 10
Popular Topics(Views)
274,325 Are you busy
208,178 Re: Forum
195,756 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3