ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Stuff that happens after we leave
by HotLine1 - 06/17/24 03:53 PM
photocell requirement for metal halide ballasts
by gfretwell - 06/17/24 01:44 PM
Commercial lift stations
by triple - 06/09/24 05:23 PM
Photo cell diagram for MH100w light
by Wayles3 - 06/02/24 07:32 AM
Chinese motors rated 59.9A 220 v 50hertz
by gfretwell - 05/30/24 08:48 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 277 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#210212 06/03/13 03:50 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 136
C
cgw Offline OP
Member
Suppose I had a large feeder running across a building (3 sets 600) and I wanted to tap the feeder with 1 set #1. Just tapping one set of the large feeder is correct and practical?

cgw #210213 06/03/13 04:12 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,335
S
Member
Without all the technical info of what you hooking up and what the existing load,If it meets the tap requirements of article 240 and not overload the original load, and meets other applicable requirements, I don't see a problem


"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
cgw #210215 06/03/13 06:50 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,942
Likes: 34
G
Member
I have a problem with it. The whole idea of paralleled conductors is that you are going to balance the load across the conductors equally (same size, length etc)
If you unequally load one conductor, you are defeating the O/C protection.
The only way I see this as legal is if you group them, make your tap and then break them out again.

I will look for a code reference


Greg Fretwell
cgw #210216 06/03/13 07:00 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,942
Likes: 34
G
Member
This is the commentary from the handbook

Quote
Where individual conductors are tapped from conductors in parallel, the tap connection must include all the conductors in parallel for that particular phase. Tapping into only one of the parallel conductor would result in unbalanced distribution of tap load current between parallel conductors, resulting in one of the conductors carrying more than its share of the load, which could cause overheating and conductor insulation failure. For example, if a 250-kcmil conductor is tapped from a set of two 500-kcmil conductors in parallel, the splicing device must include both 500-kcmil conductors and the single 250-kcmil tap conductor.


Greg Fretwell
cgw #210220 06/03/13 08:51 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,335
S
Member
I stand corrected! I missed it was a parallel run of 600's. Excuse me why I sit here looking stupid and eat my crow sandwich...


"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
cgw #210221 06/03/13 09:46 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,942
Likes: 34
G
Member
It is not insurmountable, you just need a big, 7 hole, Polaris connector.


Greg Fretwell
cgw #210222 06/04/13 12:54 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,335
S
Member
Split bolts mastic pads and Super 88 will do the trick....
anyone

Lol!


"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 136
C
cgw Offline OP
Member
Originally Posted by gfretwell
It is not insurmountable, you just need a big, 7 hole, Polaris connector.


If the feeder is for a transformer, would it be easier to connect (the tap) to the transformer primary connections.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5