ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
120/208 gives 240? please clarify
by HotLine1 - 07/13/20 12:58 PM
Questioning the electrical norms
by HotLine1 - 07/13/20 12:40 PM
You will never guess
by BigB - 07/13/20 09:45 AM
Ceiling Fan Capacitor Question
by libellis - 07/11/20 01:45 PM
Blo breaker
by Admin - 07/07/20 02:42 PM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 14 guests, and 12 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
transfer switch #20869 01/23/03 08:58 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 196
C
Cindy Offline OP
Member
maybe this is too hard to answer without lots of details, but i'll try anyway, might need an ebngineer even.

i'm looking at a job that replaces a 3-phase 800a main switchboard that has 3 200a panels downstream, one feeds a 200kva transformer that feeds 4 more downstream panels and one of these 4 is downstream of a transfer switch.

the engineers plans puts a 225a 3-phase main breaker ahead of everything. then theres a transfer switch to a 75kva generator one way, and the other way goes to all of the others (the 800a main switchboard with the 3 panels, one of which feeds the 200kva transformer which now feeds 5 downstream panels)

how can a 225a main breaker with four 4/0 thwn coppers feed all of the panels that used to be serviced by a 800a switchboard?

this is what i think. tell me if i'm thinking wrong. the new 225a main breaker is only feeding 3 panels so the load may calculate out to fit within that 225a feeder. the one that feeds the step-up transformer now takes the increased loads downstream so those loads dont need to be calculated with the main service feeder to the first set of 3 panels. you just recalculate the feeder downstream from the transformer for those panels.

ok you can wake up now, i'm done.

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Re: transfer switch #20870 01/23/03 09:21 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 175
E
electric-ed Offline
Member
I can't quite visualize the system you described.
Is there any chance you could post a diagram?

Ed

Re: transfer switch #20871 01/24/03 01:29 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 196
C
Cindy Offline OP
Member

Re: transfer switch #20872 01/24/03 09:13 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 582
R
Ron Offline
Member
It would be difficult to calculate the load for this service. There must be some incredibly low demand factors (or under loaded) on the distibution circuit breakers. I'm glad you posted the drawing, since I thought from your original description that the 800A main board was being repalced, which it isn't.
Unfortunately this design is faulty, in that the circuit breakers can never be coordinated for a distribution breaker to trip before the main. The main breaker is smaller than two of the three distribution breakers. The other thing to be sure is, that there is some type of shunt trip activation on some of the dirstibution to accomodate the smaller generator breaker as compared to the main breaker.

[This message has been edited by Ron (edited 01-24-2003).]


Ron
Re: transfer switch #20873 01/24/03 09:17 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 582
R
Ron Offline
Member
The designer must have used 220.35 (measuring maximum demand) to determine the service size. I don't think you could verify the service size based on the information on the drawing.


Ron
Re: transfer switch #20874 01/24/03 09:29 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,721
Scott35 Offline
Broom Pusher and
Member
Cindy,

Man, I just love those Thumbnail Links!!! [Linked Image]
I know that you explained how to create them before (in some old threads about ... who knows what we were all talking about then!), but could you E-mail me with a little info???

Anyhow, to the subject at hand.

Took a look at the plans - the Single Line Diagrams in Image "firesta1" aren't too bad (IMHO!).

Apparently the EE has figured no more than 75 KW will be needed in the event of Power Failure from the PoCo.
The Apparent Power rating of the Genny is 96 KVA, but that is only Apparent Power. The True Power (KW) is what the complete Gen Set can deliver within a given KVA / inside a given Power Factor.

Not sure as to how this figure of 75 KW was obtained, but most likely it would be the highest level of power needed to keep "Crucial" stuff running - such as egress lighting, F/L/S systems, certain machines which will cause some major problems if they are not stopped in a certain sequence, any servers which need to be powered down properly, and so on.

You might be able to find out what items are crucial loads by "Diving Into" the complete planset + Project's Specs Manual.

Simply, the Genny may be sized according to what loads are needed or desired when input power from the PoCo is lossed.
It could be sized Liberally - making it possible to run as much stuff anyone wanted during a power loss event (everyone runs around and turns all the lights on, or fire up all the machinery!).
Or it could be sized Conservatively - with intentions to drive the Necessary loads as figured to be crucially needed.

Even though the Genny is rated for 75 KW, the crucial loads might only total up to no more than 50 KW (or even 50 KVA). This would be a good planning idea for the Genny, as to not load it up to 100% Capacity for extended periods of time and allowing for some load diversity / variable load fluctuations.

I noticed there is a 150 Amp breaker between the Genny and the ATS. This is to protect the feeder between the Genny and the ATS in the event of a Ground Fault or an L-L / L-L-L Fault, not to limit the Genny's output.
To trip the 150 Amp breaker, the Genny would need to crank out >125 KW (or >125 KVA needs to pass through the breaker - which ever comes first).

The Prime Mover (in this case, the Diesel Motor) is rated for " × " horsepower, so once the demand of True Power (Wattage) starts to exceed the HP of the Prime Mover, the Prime Mover gets overloaded - resulting in a drammatic loss in speed.
This continues until one of three things happens:

1: Newly obtained speed results in reduced output True Power to connected equipment, which allows the Prime Mover to continue producing HP (resulting in horrible things on the "Electric Side"!!!),

2: The excessive loads are removed and Prime Mover returns to Full Governed Synchronous Speed,

or,

3: The Prime Mover stalls - eliminating the conserns for #1 and #2 above [Linked Image]

I hope this makes sense and explains why the Genny seems to be small.

Make sure the EE has the crucial load requirement figured correctly before accepting my reasoning as to why the 75 KW Gen Set should be sufficient!!!

Otherwise you must bomb me with [Linked Image] messages! [Linked Image]

Seriously though, see if you can find out what equipment is considered to be crucial (or active 24/7 and uninterrupted), then you can determine how much back-up KW is needed as a minimum.

Scott35 S.E.T.


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
Re: transfer switch #20875 01/24/03 11:09 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Cindy,
How are you planning to land 2 350kcmil per phase on a 225 amp breaker?
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: transfer switch #20876 01/24/03 03:04 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Bjarney Offline
Moderator
Bet a nickel the genset is gonna’ be re-used. For the plain-vanilla NEMA-standard 12-lead stator, the coil pairs are connected in parallel for 208Y, {120V/coil} and in series for 480Y with the voltage regulator jacked up a bit to 139V/coil {corresponding to 277V ø-n.}





[This message has been edited by Bjarney (edited 01-24-2003).]

Re: transfer switch #20877 01/24/03 03:34 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Bjarney Offline
Moderator
rescapt has an excellent point—given a typical “firehouse” 250A-frame molded-case breaker here out west, the 2x350kcmil/ø callout looks like trouble. An example might be www.cutler-hammer.eaton.com/unsecure/cms1/SD29120J.PDF pg.7 allows 1x350kcmil cable/ø, and 2AWG maximum for the stock multiconductor terminal. [That may be slightly complicated in that they’re service-entrance conductors?] It is possible details in drawing “Note 5” cover this, but I'd be asking the local engineering consultant who did the drawings. Cut-in may have been sorta’ glazed over for the bidding contractor(s) to work out at their own expense and coordination effort.




[This message has been edited by Bjarney (edited 01-24-2003).]

Re: transfer switch #20878 01/24/03 06:08 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 175
E
electric-ed Offline
Member
Oooops.

[This message has been edited by electric-ed (edited 01-24-2003).]

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Scott35
Scott35
Anaheim, CA. USA
Posts: 2,721
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 8
Popular Topics(Views)
267,400 Are you busy
202,021 Re: Forum
190,615 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3