ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
It's been an interesting career
by gfretwell - 05/23/22 09:29 PM
Material shortages???
by HotLine1 - 05/23/22 01:56 PM
Run Cap subsitution question. Two vs. one
by LarryC - 05/20/22 09:01 PM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 32 guests, and 11 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#207973 12/14/12 05:45 AM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 13
B
Member
Hello all,

Here's my dilema, I'm upgrading an exisiting building to a machine shop.

Currently it has a 400 Amp 3 phase 480 Main Service.It has a 227 KVA Transformer on a(480 volts) 200 Amp breaker feeding a 400 amp 208/120 three phase secondary panel.

I want to put the transformer (227 KVA) on a 400 breaker(Primary),and go to parallel 3/0 feeders for the primary side.

I want to add an additional 225 Amp panel and feed directly off the secondary taps on the transformer.The new 225 Amp panel would have a 225 Amp main breaker.

I'm thinking this is legal.

The 227KVA transfomer at 208 volts according to my calculations can handle 618 Amps.

Thanks for your help in advance

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
I believe you are correct. Your selection of overcurrent devices meets the primary and secondary protection requirements of Table 450.3(B).

BTW, I came up with 630 amps for a 227 kva transformer.

I'm thinking you could actually bump up the size of the new panel to 350 amps.



Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2
H
New Member
Its my opinion that your primary feeder for your 227kva transformer should be calculated as such:

227,000 / ( 1.732 x 480) = 273 amps

273 amps x 125% = 341 amp

341A next size up per 240.6 would be 350A breaker

So parallel sets of (3)#2/0 CU THHN/W @ 75 deg. would be ideal. The 400 amp breaker exceeds the maximum 125% as allowed in 430.3(b) for primary protection only.

Last edited by HTSR77; 12/15/12 12:53 AM.
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 13
B
Member
The transformer (Secondary) will be feeding two panels one 400 amp(Which is currently the Main 208/120 panel for the building) and the additional 225 Amp panel I want to add.

As far as I know it's legal to feed multiple panels from one transformer assuming you don't overload it.

Please correct me if I'm wrong Thanks

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
There are two ways of protecting a transformer, primary only and primary and secondary. If you use primary and secondary protection, your primary OCPD can be 250% of the primary current, in this case, 273 x 2,5 = 682 amps, so your 400 amp breaker is fine. The secondary full load current is 630 amp x 125% = 787 amps max ocpd. Your proposed total of ocpds for the secondary side is only 625 amps, well within the limits. you are allowed multiple ocpds, see note 2 to table 450.3(B)

Conductor protection is a separate issue from transformer protection, so parallel 3/0 conductors on a 400 amp breaker is a good pick.

Last edited by Tom; 12/15/12 10:28 PM. Reason: added conductor comment

Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Alan Belson
Alan Belson
Mayenne N. France
Posts: 1,803
Joined: March 2005
Top Posters(30 Days)
LarryC 3
NORCAL 2
Popular Topics(Views)
291,392 Are you busy
223,876 Re: Forum
209,260 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5