ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
220/230/240V 60Hz Systems
by gfretwell. 09/16/18 12:37 PM
Acronis Backup 2017
by gfretwell. 09/16/18 12:46 AM
Inspection camera help
by Bill Addiss. 09/15/18 11:32 AM
Tingle off the water spigot
by Trumpy. 09/15/18 03:24 AM
Lighting Load questions
by HotLine1. 09/14/18 07:04 PM
New in the Gallery:
Plug terminals
Housebilding DIY wiring
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (Bill Addiss), 26 guests, and 26 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations #206242
06/08/12 06:49 PM
06/08/12 06:49 PM
W
wewire2  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
California
What do you guys think about this... Bridgeport makes a line of conduit fittings that used to be U.L. listed as being watertight. Should an inspector have an issue with installing a compression type connector like this outdoors on a conduit riser that is entering the bottom of a panel where it is shielded from direct rain? This might be a trick question...
Why do I ask???
3" diecast Bridgeport EMT/IMC/Rigid connector = $15.
3" Rigid connector = $130 - $180.


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations [Re: wewire2] #206244
06/09/12 05:27 AM
06/09/12 05:27 AM
T
Tesla  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
Sacramento, CA
Are you referring to a 'Myers hub' as your Rigid connector?

======

I've never seen diecast connectors ever given a RT listing. Steel, yes.

The newer RT connectors don't differ much: just an additional seal, AFAIK.

I've seen inspectors tolerate Greenfield/ flex ( not Sealtite ) for THWN-2 taps to HVAC condensers -- in residential situations.

In which case, might D.C. S.S. connectors also pass for your application?

BTW, at 3", DCSS fit both RMC/IMC and EMT.


Tesla
Re: Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations [Re: Tesla] #206245
06/09/12 03:39 PM
06/09/12 03:39 PM
W
wewire2  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
California
The connector is a 3" D.C. compression connector that fits EMT/IMC/RGS and is the older style without plastic gaskets.
Since the fitting is under the panel it would be at most an
occasional damp location. I was wondering if would be code compliant to use the die-cast fitting since it is placed so as to prevent moisture from entering. 314.15 only addresses wet locations as far as the U.L. listing requirement is concerned. BTW, The rigid is being used to thwart copper thieves and is overkill for conductor protection in this case.

Re: Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations [Re: wewire2] #206246
06/10/12 03:27 PM
06/10/12 03:27 PM
HotLine1  Offline

Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,024
Brick, NJ USA
Sounds like the local AHJ determines if the underside of the panel requires a watertite connector or not.

Based on his decission, that would be your answer.

Asking him before you spend $$$.





John
Re: Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations [Re: HotLine1] #206247
06/10/12 04:19 PM
06/10/12 04:19 PM
W
wewire2  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
California
Good advice. I tried calling a couple times but couldn't get through. Double locknut threaded rigid connections under a panel or box outside never seem to raise an eyebrow. The meter panels have weep holes in them anyways so it shouldn't be an issue.


Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
dougwells
dougwells
kamloops BC Canada
Posts: 1,149
Joined: May 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 13
Trumpy 11
sparky 9
Popular Topics(Views)
249,295 Are you busy
187,228 Re: Forum
176,589 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.017s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9695 MB (Peak: 1.1121 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-09-20 02:50:57 UTC