ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Lock-down Thread
by Bill Addiss - 02/27/21 01:16 PM
Northern Tool Recalls Powerhorse Generators
by Admin - 02/25/21 09:49 PM
You will never guess
by gfretwell - 02/25/21 07:48 PM
New tool
by SMOKEYBOB - 02/15/21 04:59 PM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (Scott35), 21 guests, and 20 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations #206242 06/08/12 05:49 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
W
wewire2 Offline OP
Member
What do you guys think about this... Bridgeport makes a line of conduit fittings that used to be U.L. listed as being watertight. Should an inspector have an issue with installing a compression type connector like this outdoors on a conduit riser that is entering the bottom of a panel where it is shielded from direct rain? This might be a trick question...
Why do I ask???
3" diecast Bridgeport EMT/IMC/Rigid connector = $15.
3" Rigid connector = $130 - $180.


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations [Re: wewire2] #206244 06/09/12 04:27 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
T
Tesla Offline
Member
Are you referring to a 'Myers hub' as your Rigid connector?

======

I've never seen diecast connectors ever given a RT listing. Steel, yes.

The newer RT connectors don't differ much: just an additional seal, AFAIK.

I've seen inspectors tolerate Greenfield/ flex ( not Sealtite ) for THWN-2 taps to HVAC condensers -- in residential situations.

In which case, might D.C. S.S. connectors also pass for your application?

BTW, at 3", DCSS fit both RMC/IMC and EMT.


Tesla
Re: Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations [Re: Tesla] #206245 06/09/12 02:39 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
W
wewire2 Offline OP
Member
The connector is a 3" D.C. compression connector that fits EMT/IMC/RGS and is the older style without plastic gaskets.
Since the fitting is under the panel it would be at most an
occasional damp location. I was wondering if would be code compliant to use the die-cast fitting since it is placed so as to prevent moisture from entering. 314.15 only addresses wet locations as far as the U.L. listing requirement is concerned. BTW, The rigid is being used to thwart copper thieves and is overkill for conductor protection in this case.

Re: Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations [Re: wewire2] #206246 06/10/12 02:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,233
HotLine1 Offline
Member
Sounds like the local AHJ determines if the underside of the panel requires a watertite connector or not.

Based on his decission, that would be your answer.

Asking him before you spend $$$.





John
Re: Non-watertight fittings in shielded locations [Re: HotLine1] #206247 06/10/12 03:19 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
W
wewire2 Offline OP
Member
Good advice. I tried calling a couple times but couldn't get through. Double locknut threaded rigid connections under a panel or box outside never seem to raise an eyebrow. The meter panels have weep holes in them anyways so it shouldn't be an issue.


Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
pcsailor
pcsailor
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 21
Joined: September 2019
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
275,482 Are you busy
209,385 Re: Forum
196,771 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3