ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
Board tester power supply?
by JoeTestingEngr. 10/13/18 12:14 AM
Voltage sag
by Trumpy. 10/12/18 06:59 PM
220/230/240V 60Hz Systems
by Trumpy. 10/12/18 06:50 PM
Linear Power Supply Quits Under Load
by JoeTestingEngr. 10/10/18 08:47 PM
License to survive
by HotLine1. 10/02/18 08:52 PM
New in the Gallery:
What is this for?
Plug terminals
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 34 guests, and 27 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
NEC Art 240.4(B) #201260
05/23/11 11:22 AM
05/23/11 11:22 AM
B
Bravo  Offline OP
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 30
NY, USA
I have a situation where I client wants to use 500-kcmil THWN copper conductors, 75deg (380A) protected by a 400A OCPD. Please correct me if I am wrong but in accordance to 240.4 this is allowed as long as the calculated load does not exceed the ampacity of the conductors (380A)?

I need help clarifying part (B). The OCPD is 100% rated with adjustable trip unit. Our firms's licensed engineer will not stamp dwgs if the breaker is 100% rated and does not trust that the trip will be adjusted in the field.

again I need understanding what part (B) is stating.

Thanks in advance.

I have in the process of updating my profile.
My email is dean.vanetten@mwgroup.net.

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: NEC Art 240.4(B) [Re: Bravo] #201261
05/23/11 12:02 PM
05/23/11 12:02 PM
S
sabrown  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 303
Ogden, Utah, USA
According to your reference in 240.4B yes it is allowed. As an Engineer, he has the final say as to what he will stamp and what he won't, whether it meets code or not. Good design may have other reasons may preclude the use of the 400 amp, 100% rated breaker. Anyway, it is his choice to stamp or not, right or perceived wrong.

Look for options acceptable to him, such as a 100% rated braker with (I guess they may be called) replacable current modules. Or a permanent plaque stating maximum rating the breaker may be adjusted to.

Re: NEC Art 240.4(B) [Re: Bravo] #201262
05/23/11 12:03 PM
05/23/11 12:03 PM
S
sabrown  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 303
Ogden, Utah, USA
AND or her.

Re: NEC Art 240.4(B) [Re: Bravo] #201266
05/23/11 02:45 PM
05/23/11 02:45 PM
HotLine1  Offline

Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,034
Brick, NJ USA
Dean:
Did you read 240.6 (C)from 2008, that may be an acceptable option to present to the Engineer.

As Sabrown said, the Engineer of record has the ultimate & final say.



John
Re: NEC Art 240.4(B) [Re: sabrown] #201268
05/23/11 05:05 PM
05/23/11 05:05 PM
B
Bravo  Offline OP
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 30
NY, USA
Sabrown,

Good point, but even a plaque indicating max rated adjustment cant stop someone from setting trip higher than ampacity.

Dean

Re: NEC Art 240.4(B) [Re: HotLine1] #201269
05/23/11 05:08 PM
05/23/11 05:08 PM
B
Bravo  Offline OP
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 30
NY, USA
That is also a valid point. Restricting the access to adjusting the trip unit helps along with a plaque indicating max trip setting allowed. Thank you


Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
dougwells
dougwells
kamloops BC Canada
Posts: 1,149
Joined: May 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
sparky 11
Admin 5
Popular Topics(Views)
250,245 Are you busy
187,902 Re: Forum
177,433 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.026s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.9764 MB (Peak: 1.1232 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-10-15 13:30:47 UTC