ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Featured:

 Electrical
 Clearance

 *
 Tools
 *

 Books

 *

 Test Equipment

 

Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 597 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 183
J
Member
you raise a good point, why no derating if you ran this as three conductors of equivalent ampacity but derating for 6 conductors? the assumption is the same heat is generated by the 3 conductors as the 6 conductors or even triple and quad feeders.

Also, since your install starts in one jurisdiction and ends up in another, would you need to comply with CEC at one end and NEC at the other, with two permits, and two inspections?

Tools for Electricians:

Tools for Electricians, Installers & Maintenance Technicians

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
T
Member
Skin effect is huge as the conductors get huge. Unless spec'd the larger conductors are uneconomic.

Paralleling a fist full of 1/0s will give you maximum un-derated capacity.

The rules exist based upon heat buildup/ radiation. In underground/piped systems there is a limit as to how fast the heat can bleed off. While aboveground conduit would seem to have advantage -- remember that air temperatures of 100 F are possible. This means that worst case calculations show either route rate limited.

Since these conductors are crossing the border -- I'd hand the issue off to an EE and get him to take the exposure.

I can't see anyone paying an EC for his professional expertise in such matters. Think of yourself as a general practitioner and the EE as a surgeon. No one wants your opinion on heard operations. They certainly aren't going to pay for it.

Concentrate on what you can get paid for -- not on what piques your professional interest. Keep that as a hobby -- and don't expose yourself to professional liability.

-----

I've had instances where I was right and the 'expert' was wrong. It went his way all the way down the line. I had no business being that knowledgeable. My boss was not interested in defending my position in the slightest.

Being correct -- but beyond your credentials -- will get you killed, professionally.



Tesla
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 111
E
Member
Copper conductors, underground.

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 947
T
twh Offline
Member
I think the cross section area of 500 mcm is double 250 mcm. It looks like it has half the resistance.

http://www.nexans.ca/eservice/Canada-en_CA/navigate_235212/Soft_Bare_Copper.html#top

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 111
E
Member
Conductors don't cross the border. They supply power to the toll booths, shop and security building on the Canadian side. The bridge spans the border, has lights etc on it but the wires I'm dealing with are the main service wires.

Wires to first disconnect are 3 x 350MCM R90 copper ran underground to a 400amp fused disconnect. (3" rigid stubs up and comes in the building above ground and you can see 3" conduit going up a near by pole)
From there 6 x 4/0 R 90 copper conductors in a rigid 3" underground a short distance to main 400amp distribution panel. Was origionally fused at 300amps, they want more. Actually one fuse was 300amps and the other was 330amps?

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 947
T
twh Offline
Member
Underground conductors are Diagrams B4-1 to B4-4 and Tables D8A to D15B in the Canadian Code.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 111
E
Member
Quote
So the service conductors from the POCO are single 350MCM in a conduit. What amperage are they good for using the NEC?

CEC = 325amps R90


Can someone with the NEC give me a hand on this one?

Last edited by Eddy Current; 02/18/11 09:30 AM.
Tools for Electricians:

Tools for Electricians, Installers & Maintenance Technicians

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 264
W
Member
310.16 says 310 amps for copper, and 250 for aluminum reading from the 60 degree c table.


Jimmy

Life is tough, Life is tougher when you are stupid
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,049
Likes: 38
G
Member
You should be able to use the 75c column.


Greg Fretwell
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5