ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Mini Split voltage
by Garemaret - 06/21/24 04:53 AM
Strobing LEDs
by Anovalight - 06/20/24 03:16 AM
Stuff that happens after we leave
by HotLine1 - 06/17/24 03:53 PM
photocell requirement for metal halide ballasts
by gfretwell - 06/17/24 01:44 PM
Commercial lift stations
by triple - 06/09/24 05:23 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 156 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,942
Likes: 34
G
Member
Is there a violation if you used a cable with another conductor or two in a raceway system?
(example a 12-3 w/g Romex and an additional THHN for the 4th ungrounded conductor in a 3/4" raceway).
It didn't sound right when I heard it but I am not sure what you would cite.


Greg Fretwell
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 7
Member
That's interesting...
I must say none of the rocket scientists here thought that up....yet!
Time to ponder what (if anything) to cite.

FYI: another reason to add common sense to the NEC?



John
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 356
Member
can you install NM cable in a complete raceway system? Or only in a piece of raceway just for physical protection?


Be kind to your neighbor, he knows where you live

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,942
Likes: 34
G
Member
I can't cite any rule that says you can't have NM cable in a raceway system. Since all circuit conductors come through the same connector there are no inductive heating problems. I know this is ugly but I am stumped to come up with a violation.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
T
Member
It's not a violation.

However, due to economics you'd not expect to see it.

It's generally impractical.


Tesla
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 764
K
Member
Iím wondering if 300.3[B] and 300.3[B],1 might apply if the conductors are all part of the same circuit, since both also state the same "cable or cord" as well.
Something else maybe, is that 334.15[B] is for exposed work, so not sure if this would preclude the NM from being run in a conduit that is concealed or partially concealed.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,942
Likes: 34
G
Member
I suspect the RX was there first and the THHN was added.

KJay, this was all exposed in a garage/shop. A 240 2 pole was converted to 120/240 3 pole from what I could assume.
I see RX in pipe quite a bit, just because that is what resi guys have on the truck or what homeowners buy at the HD. I bet 99% of it is fed into the pipe as they build the system just because of how hard it is to pull RX in pipe.
I think part of it is you can buy RX cheaper than THHN if you don't want 500 feet.

I was not AHJ, just asked if it was legal as "gee whiz" info.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 764
K
Member
I guess technically you might be able to say that EMT fittings are not designed or listed for use with NM cables, since I see where 300.15 says that fittings and connectors shall be used only with the specific wiring method for which they are designed and listed.

IMO, I donít think the NEC allowing NM to be sleeved for protection was intended to allow unlimited use like that, but Iím also not sure exactly where to find a specific rule prohibiting it.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 7
Member
Kjay:
The fittings you reference above are EMT, and used on the EMT, not the NM as I understand Gregs description. 300.15 would be a bad cite.

I tend to say there is nothing to directly cite, unless at the begining of the circuit, there is no 'from-to' connector.



John
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 764
K
Member
Originally Posted by HotLine1
Kjay:
The fittings you reference above are EMT, and used on the EMT, not the NM as I understand Gregs description. 300.15 would be a bad cite.

I tend to say there is nothing to directly cite, unless at the begining of the circuit, there is no 'from-to' connector.



True. It was just something to mull over. My thought was that NM is a separate wiring method with its own installation requirements and listed connectors, etc.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5