ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
AC-DC stage Ultra-Fast charger, how it's made?
by fedemussi - 06/24/22 10:22 AM
Childrens safety outlets
by dsk - 06/17/22 02:42 AM
Your favourite food?
by NORCAL - 06/16/22 12:06 AM
Price action trading with RENKO
by gfretwell - 06/15/22 02:08 PM
Please Help Wiring DCDC Buck Converter
by gfretwell - 06/15/22 01:58 PM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 5 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,696
Likes: 11
G
Member
Is there a violation if you used a cable with another conductor or two in a raceway system?
(example a 12-3 w/g Romex and an additional THHN for the 4th ungrounded conductor in a 3/4" raceway).
It didn't sound right when I heard it but I am not sure what you would cite.


Greg Fretwell
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with these Exam Prep Combos:
 

>> Master Electrician Exam Prep     >> JourneyMan Electrician Exam Prep
 

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,298
Likes: 6
Member
That's interesting...
I must say none of the rocket scientists here thought that up....yet!
Time to ponder what (if anything) to cite.

FYI: another reason to add common sense to the NEC?



John
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 356
Member
can you install NM cable in a complete raceway system? Or only in a piece of raceway just for physical protection?


Be kind to your neighbor, he knows where you live

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,696
Likes: 11
G
Member
I can't cite any rule that says you can't have NM cable in a raceway system. Since all circuit conductors come through the same connector there are no inductive heating problems. I know this is ugly but I am stumped to come up with a violation.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
T
Member
It's not a violation.

However, due to economics you'd not expect to see it.

It's generally impractical.


Tesla
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 763
K
Member
Iím wondering if 300.3[B] and 300.3[B],1 might apply if the conductors are all part of the same circuit, since both also state the same "cable or cord" as well.
Something else maybe, is that 334.15[B] is for exposed work, so not sure if this would preclude the NM from being run in a conduit that is concealed or partially concealed.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,696
Likes: 11
G
Member
I suspect the RX was there first and the THHN was added.

KJay, this was all exposed in a garage/shop. A 240 2 pole was converted to 120/240 3 pole from what I could assume.
I see RX in pipe quite a bit, just because that is what resi guys have on the truck or what homeowners buy at the HD. I bet 99% of it is fed into the pipe as they build the system just because of how hard it is to pull RX in pipe.
I think part of it is you can buy RX cheaper than THHN if you don't want 500 feet.

I was not AHJ, just asked if it was legal as "gee whiz" info.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 763
K
Member
I guess technically you might be able to say that EMT fittings are not designed or listed for use with NM cables, since I see where 300.15 says that fittings and connectors shall be used only with the specific wiring method for which they are designed and listed.

IMO, I donít think the NEC allowing NM to be sleeved for protection was intended to allow unlimited use like that, but Iím also not sure exactly where to find a specific rule prohibiting it.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,298
Likes: 6
Member
Kjay:
The fittings you reference above are EMT, and used on the EMT, not the NM as I understand Gregs description. 300.15 would be a bad cite.

I tend to say there is nothing to directly cite, unless at the begining of the circuit, there is no 'from-to' connector.



John
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 763
K
Member
Originally Posted by HotLine1
Kjay:
The fittings you reference above are EMT, and used on the EMT, not the NM as I understand Gregs description. 300.15 would be a bad cite.

I tend to say there is nothing to directly cite, unless at the begining of the circuit, there is no 'from-to' connector.



True. It was just something to mull over. My thought was that NM is a separate wiring method with its own installation requirements and listed connectors, etc.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
mxslick
mxslick
Atomic City, ID USA
Posts: 806
Joined: October 2004
Top Posters(30 Days)
Trumpy 7
triple 3
dobler 2
Asset 2
Popular Topics(Views)
292,895 Are you busy
224,928 Re: Forum
210,354 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5