I added a subpanel directly next to the main panel. I had to move 2 circuits into the new panel to make way for the "main" feeding the new panel. Since the neutrals were already terminated in the existing panel, can I just move the hots to the new panel through the 1 1/2 pvc conduit I run the feeder through or is there something in the code that won't allow this??? Thanks for the help...
IMO, since it's now on the load side of the service disconnecting means, you would need to isolate the neutrals from the equipment grounding conductors for any circuits supplied by that subpanel, so as is, I believe the current install would likely be a violation of 250.24,.
I would normally install a 4-wire feeder to a subpanel with a separate neutral bus and equipment grounding terminal bar.
Re: Neutrals in same panel???
#193799 04/20/1012:23 PM04/20/1012:23 PM
I believe sections 300.3 (B) for all the conductors in a circuit to be in the same raceway, auxillery gutter , etc. would apply. Also section 250.4 (A)(5) for a low impedence path could be a problem with the hot coming from one panel and the grounded in another. I don't believe it is worth the possiblity of having problems. Just extend the groundeds to the sub panel and be done with it.
The way I see this he is only talking about a circuit that has it's overcurrent device in the second panel. Electrically that is a switch loop. There will not be any inductive heating problems with that arrangement. I assume the neutral and grounds are separated in that second panel but he is still not imposing any objectionable current on the EGC so that concern is allayed. 250.4 refers to the EGC and you have a lower impedance to ground in the main than you do in a sub. By wire nutting an extension on the neutral you are simply adding 2 more possible places for this to fail. The bottom line is, if the AHJ wants it you probably have to do it but I am not sure what the justification would be beyond that. The only case I could think of would be if this is a multiwire circuit (240.4(D)) but even then the code would make something less safe by adding one more connection than was necessary.
If this is a pure 240v load there wouldn't be a neutral anyway. Maybe the trick would have been to swing over the water heater.
I'm glad this question came up because I do this all the time, especially when adding circuits for hot tubs. I often make it a point to move the water heater circuit to make room for the breaker feeding the sub panel as a general practice.
I recently installed a manual generator transfer panel (interlocked main breakers), connected to the main panel with a single 2" PVC nipple between them. Into the sub panel, I moved the cooktop, water pump and about eight lighting/SA circuits and left the neutrals in-place in the main panel. After the fact, I've been bouncing this concept around in my head ever since.
It passed inspection, and I don't think that there's anything wrong with this, but I can see where it would raise a few eyebrows.
Alan has a point & an Article that I would used if pressed.
Which one? 250.4 refers to the EGC so that is not relevant.
The idea of all conductors in the same raceway is to address inductive heating and that is not an issue here. Electrically this is a switch loop. If the AHJ told me to do it, I would wire nut some white wire in there to make him happy but I would still be wondering why.