ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
New tool
by gfretwell - 10/24/20 11:09 AM
Where is Everyone?
by Bill Addiss - 10/17/20 07:04 PM
Beyond Belief
by gfretwell - 09/27/20 12:03 AM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (Scott35), 16 guests, and 18 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Replacing GEC #1914 06/07/01 04:20 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,961
Bill Addiss Offline OP
Member
When doing an Residential service upgrade and the GEC to the Water main is replaced, what do you do with the old one? Leave it connected or cut it out? Please include your reasoning.

[Linked Image]
Bill


Bill
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Re: Replacing GEC #1915 06/07/01 05:09 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,389
S
sparky Offline
Member
ok i'll play!
if it is truely an 'upgrade' then the GEC required is probably larger, the old clamps are probably rusted, etc.]
usually i find the old connections NG due to corrosion, and replace with new geased ( no-lox) clamps.
The older ones usually do not 'jump' the meter, so in that sense they are NG also.


so why leave the old one anyhow? i don't get it? am i slow here? hey,if you were dropped on your head as a baby would it be your fault???


[Linked Image]

[This message has been edited by Webmaster (edited 06-07-2001).]

Re: Replacing GEC #1916 06/07/01 05:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,961
Bill Addiss Offline OP
Member
Sparky,

(Serious question)

Many times one of the utilities has bonded to the original GEC with a split bolt and it was closed up in the wall or ceiling. can't always be sure if something is using it or not. I guess the question really is if there is any harm in leaving it?

Hey, what if all the 3 prong receptacles were installed on old 2 wire cable and bonded to that old GEC as it ran past. If you cut it all your Grounds are then NG (we're PG rated here). [Linked Image]

What do you think?

Bill

[This message has been edited by Bill Addiss (edited 06-07-2001).]


Bill
Re: Replacing GEC #1917 06/07/01 05:55 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
If it is in good shape, I would be strongly inclined to leave it.

If it is deteriorated and I can remove it, I would remove it, just like any other deleted wiring.

If I can't remove it, then I have to bond it.

Leaving it hanging is not an option.

Re: Replacing GEC #1918 06/07/01 09:10 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,961
Bill Addiss Offline OP
Member
Dspark,

I'm inclined to keep it too if I can't see the full length of it I can't tell if it's being used as a path by other things. I figure that even if it is disconnected or cut from one end (or too short to reach) it is still serving a purpose to 'other' bonded items if any should exist.

Bill


Bill
Re: Replacing GEC #1919 06/07/01 09:49 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,389
S
sparky Offline
Member
Ok,
that's different,
the next Q that comes to mind would be how to assess the hidden GEC's usage.

Re: Replacing GEC #1920 06/07/01 09:59 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,961
Bill Addiss Offline OP
Member
Sparky,

The point is that if it's not detrimental in some way it can be left in place. If it is hidden by finish it might be better left alone, or at least connected at one end.

Bill


Bill
Re: Replacing GEC #1921 06/08/01 07:14 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,389
S
sparky Offline
Member
ok, in the particular case you pose, it would no longer be a GEC, it would be a 'bond' , or ECG right? so it's connection would follow suit.

If the original connection was in question, would you move this to the closest JB ???

[Linked Image]

Re: Replacing GEC #1922 06/08/01 08:12 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,961
Bill Addiss Offline OP
Member
Sparky,

It would be a bond, yes. Do you know of any reason why it shouldn't/couldn't be allowed to remain connected at both ends? That way it would also serve as a redundant/backup GEC?

Bill


Bill
Re: Replacing GEC #1923 06/08/01 08:47 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,389
S
sparky Offline
Member
Well Bill,
I don't see what harm it can do to leave the old GEC connected. I have done many service changes where the meter or the panel are moved.(As i am sure you have also)

I have utilized the old GEC and electrodes simply because i beleive more earth contact will achieve the 25 ohms or less ruling, and as you've stated, the possibilty of a backup.

GEC's can be installed in singular runs, so by code we could have as many seperate GEC runs as electrodes we desire.

If the original GEC has been installed correctly, the only possible parrallel path would be back to the serving utility X-former through common water or other mettalic lines in the event of a noodle faluire ( old ground, i know)

The event of a lighting strike or other power surge would, in theory, see ampacity divide among the many GEC's

better???

[Linked Image]


Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Admin
Admin
NY, USA
Posts: 3,631
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 3
Popular Topics(Views)
270,784 Are you busy
204,997 Re: Forum
193,113 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3