ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
How's Florida doing with Hurricane Ian?
by Bill Addiss - 09/28/22 12:41 PM
Tough being a lineman's kid
by Bill Addiss - 09/28/22 12:39 PM
GFCI's pops in large numbers
by dsk - 09/26/22 04:35 AM
AFCI’s Revisited
by sparky - 09/24/22 09:58 AM
NFPA Price Increase Coming
by Bill Addiss - 09/23/22 02:22 PM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 37 guests, and 12 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
#189969 10/31/09 08:37 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Is it clear that a bonding jumper is required between the green screw of a receptacle and a metal box when the receptacle is mounted on a 4 inch square raised cover?


George Little
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with these Exam Prep Combos:
 

>> Master Electrician Exam Prep     >> JourneyMan Electrician Exam Prep
 

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 1
Cat Servant
Member
No, not clear at all.

In the latest edition, you still do not require such a bonding jumper if the cover has the 'dimpled' corners, or, IMO, for a metal cut-in box.

The 2008 NEC is where the distinction was made between the covers with the dimpled corners, and the nice, square-face covers. I'll see if I can find pics.

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 1
Cat Servant
Member
OK, herre are the pics!

This one still does not require a bonding jumper:
[Linked Image from electrical-photos.com]

While this style cover does require a bonding jumper:
[Linked Image from electrical-photos.com]

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,745
Likes: 13
G
Member
The receptacle also need to be permanently attached to the cover by rivets or screws with a thread locking means.

I would want to see the listing of that cover/receptacle combo ... or a bonding jumper.

If I really believed nobody would ever loosen the screws on that cover with the power on I might be a little more easy going wink


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
Y
Member
2008 NEC Code handbook Page 254 ( 250.146 ).
Handbook has photos & Explaination.
Yoopersup

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Thanks Ernie- Looks like most installations will need a bonding jumper if the receptacle is field installed on a four square raised cover. Just followed your tip and looked in the '08 handbook.

You going to be in Ann Arbor 12/3-4/09?


George Little
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 763
K
Member
Where 250.146,[A] references "a rivet or thread locking or screw locking means", would this include those little 6/32 nuts with the machined serrations or the serrated lock washers attached to them?

I've always just connected a pigtail to the device, but would be good to know the details.
Other than looking up the individual manufactures listing, is there any identifiable marking on these covers that would indicate they are listed for grounding?

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 1
Cat Servant
Member
KJay, as I understand it, the supplied hardware does meet the code requirements for the 'screw locking means.'

Murphys' law being what it is, I next expect the folks who brought this on - remember all those rants against metal boxes on the ends of extension cords, with pictures of the assemblies missing screws and coming apart? - to start ranting anew when they find some place where "Loctite" was applied to the hardware.

Make no mistake about it; there are those who will find fault with everything. These are the folks who won't be happy until EVERY device has a pigtail and EVERY circuit has a gree wire.

No, there is no speciific marking on the packaging regarding the use of pigtails.

Which, of course, brings up another 'detail.' Virtually every cover of this type is made by one of two firms. The code change only impacts the one company's product; 'corners in' or 'corners out' was simply a style difference between the two firms.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,745
Likes: 13
G
Member
Unless they get the assembly listed as being suitable for grounding the corner style is academic. I am betting, when they do it will be stamped in the cover. I certainly expect to see a full page, glossy, ad in the IAEI magazine.

Yes I am one of those people who thinks every circuit should have a green (or bare) wire ground.
Fortunately, for me, that was the way all state RFPs were written so I didn't have to split hairs about it.
I am just a spectator now so it really doesn't matter too much what I think. wink


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 1
Cat Servant
Member
Presenting the opposing point of view:

1) I see no rewuirement for the cover to be specifically listed as a grounding means; just that there be some method used to prevent the screws from vibrating loose; and,

2) I have, nor has the NEC had, any problem with metal conduit being used as the ground conductor. If anything, this pronciple is reinforced with the new "MC smart,' that does away with the need to have a green wire in MC.

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC Now Available!
 
* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Grover
Grover
Sebago, ME, USA
Posts: 109
Joined: January 2005
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
297,776 Are you busy
228,515 Re: Forum
213,347 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5