ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 444 guests, and 35 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
Y
Member
George
230.72 (C) Exception.
Take a look. Just a thought

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 201
A
Member
230.92 NEC 08

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,382
Likes: 7
Member
Ayrton:
The OP issue is to prevent vandals from turning off the power to the structure.



John
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 201
A
Member
I understand the "morale of the story "

230.92 basicaly tells us it is allowable to lock the service disconnect with exceptions. If locked or sealed or not accessable to tenants, than branch circuit overprotection is required to be accessable to tenant. Very coomon. Electric room with all tenant service equip and meters....LOCKED but tenants have branch circuit panel in suites or apts.

Am I interpreting this right?

I dont see anything in 230.72 about locking the service disconnect. It s talking about accessability to tenants. Says NOTHING about being allowed to LOCK service disconnect

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,382
Likes: 7
Member
"Am I interpreting this right? "

Basically, yes


John
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5