ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 410 guests, and 21 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 337
S
Member
I suppose someone would be happy, but I think that a specific rule would be a big mistake. For example, what if I place a receptacle 300 feet away from the service for a 120 volt, 0.27 amps (32 watt) chlorinator, will we be testing the voltage drop at 12 or 16 amps? Or maybe as it is a single receptacle, 1.5 amps (180 watts)?

This is just as silly as 2% for feeders and 3% max for branch circuits when I have situations where it makes far more economic sense to go some other ratio to meet 5% max overall. This is one reason why these should remain fine print notes or general guidelines.

When we are to specific we through out common sense. For example the rule requiring when circuit conductors are upsized for voltage drop, a corresponding upsize of the equipment ground must be applied throws out an engineered system that sizes the equipment ground properly.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,931
Likes: 34
G
Member
When I brought up this in the Fl IAEI BB and was told by several people it was already in the energy code I asked who was actually doing V/D calculations on plan review. The silence was deafening.
I am still not sure how you will be enforcing this unless we are talking about dedicated circuits to equipment with nameplate loads on the plan.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 337
S
Member
We are required to do them, and I do, except I look at it end to end for the total 5% and at design loads not circuit capability.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5