ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 42 guests, and 12 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 764
K
KJay Offline OP
Member
Does anyone here have the Cadet SoftHeat hydronic electric baseboard heaters at home or have any customers that own them?
These are the type that consist of a finned copper tube filled with an 80/20-water/glycol mix and use an immersed heating element. Ive only seen these in a couple of homes, but the owners generally seemed very pleased with them.
Other than the obvious safety advantage of lower operating temperature, are these worth the added expense over standard electric baseboard heaters?

Thanks

link: http://www.cadetco.com/show_product.php?prodid=1010

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 362
Member
Hi KJay,
I have used Q-mark's hydronic heats quite often. The intial cost is alittle high however they claim to have a payback period, and deliver a nice even heat. Most customers tell me they think they are worth the additional cost.


Ob


Choose your customers, don't let them choose you.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 745
E
Member
I have installed many of them. They are awesome. I wouldn't recommend any other kind of baseboard heat.

I lived in a house in Northern NJ in the late 70's that had them throughout. The heat was great and the bills were better than my neighbor (with an identical new house) using oil heat.

They are quite a bit more expensive than traditional units, but well worth the difference from a consumer's perspective.


---Ed---

"But the guy at Home Depot said it would work."
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 764
K
KJay Offline OP
Member
Thanks for the replies. It sounds like this type of heater has been around for quite a while and is pretty well regarded.
In my area, for a brief period last year, when fuel prices were at their all time high, it was probably the first time in close to 30-years that electric heat was more economical to operate than oil or gas fired heating systems.
Im beginning to think it may be possible, if fuel costs eventually approach anything near those peak levels again, that premium electric heaters such as this type might once again become a viable alternative as a primary home heating system.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,213
S
Member
When you're talking electric resistance heat like this, they're all equally inefficient. You're not going to see a payback period, either- 15000W of heat is 15000W regardless of how it gets from the resistance element to the room. This (and any other electric strip heater) is going to use about 2.5x as much electricity as an electric heat pump for the same heating capacity.

Immersing the heating element does reduce the risk of fire vs one with unencapsulated toaster-stype heating elements, though.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5