ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
Brookstone Wireless Speakers Recalled
by Admin. 10/22/18 11:23 PM
Briggs & Stratton Recalls Fuel Tank Caps
by Admin. 10/22/18 11:16 PM
Hydrolevel Recalls Controllers for Boilers
by Admin. 10/22/18 11:11 PM
Kaz Recalls Stinger Insect Zappers
by Admin. 10/22/18 11:03 PM
New in the Gallery:
What is this for?
Plug terminals
Who's Online Now
2 registered members (Admin, JoeTestingEngr), 10 guests, and 28 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
SER sizing #182079
11/17/08 05:36 PM
11/17/08 05:36 PM
H
highground  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 53
Chama, NM
What is the correct size of AL SER cable to use a feeder for a 100A subpanel in a residential setting? I seem to be getting different opinions from my two inspectors. I'm using the 2008 code.

Thanks in advance

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: SER sizing [Re: highground] #182083
11/17/08 06:13 PM
11/17/08 06:13 PM
G
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
I just read in the '08 NEC Article 3 Section 310.15(B)(6) and as I read it the feeder must be #1 Alm. Unless it carries the entire load of the dwelling and then it can be a #2 Alm.
The Code panel has waffled back and forth and reworded this one many times and now with the '08 I think the aforementioned sizes would be proper. That would be my call Until someone convinces me otherwise.


George Little
Re: SER sizing [Re: George Little] #182089
11/17/08 09:16 PM
11/17/08 09:16 PM
G
gfretwell  Offline

Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,298
Estero,Fl,usa
I am with George, The confusion comes when people confuse a "main feeder" with a load side feeder in a residence.


Greg Fretwell
Re: SER sizing [Re: gfretwell] #182105
11/18/08 09:04 PM
11/18/08 09:04 PM
Tom  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Shinnston, WV USA
I agree with the above posts. The confusion was even worse until they removed that pesky "s" at the end of feeder(s).

AFAIK, the CMP responsible for this always felt that the feeder was meant to carry the entire load and table 310.15(B)(6) has probably led to a lot of bad language & a few fistfights.


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Re: SER sizing [Re: Tom] #182111
11/18/08 10:08 PM
11/18/08 10:08 PM
E
Electricmanscott  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,457
Holden, MA USA
I see undersized feeders all the time. Seems many mis-apply 310.15 B 6

Re: SER sizing [Re: Electricmanscott] #182404
11/25/08 03:02 PM
11/25/08 03:02 PM
M
macmikeman  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 717
Honolulu, Hawaii
Shortly my town will be adopting the 2008, and this will bring about new awareness of the requirements of feeder sizing, due to the fact that the NEC has made it clear that 310.15 B. 6 applies to a single feeder carrying all the load of a dwelling. Couple that with the new temperature rating for ser cable to the 60 deg column in 310.16 and the feeder sizes will increase by an avarage of two sizes on most new dwellings. Stictly my own opinion, but with the proper sized overcurrent protective device ahead of the "sub' feeder, the old sizing standard used for ser cables was already more than adaquate for the real life loads encountered. These new rules are huge overkill, but still it is in the code, so therefore it is just how it is, like it or not.


Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Tom
Tom
Shinnston, WV USA
Posts: 1,044
Joined: January 2001
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
sparky 11
Admin 6
Popular Topics(Views)
250,642 Are you busy
188,134 Re: Forum
177,810 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.025s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.9776 MB (Peak: 1.1271 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-10-23 03:24:04 UTC