ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Any women electricians here?
by gfretwell - 01/17/22 01:44 PM
12 Lead Motor Connection Weird
by Elektrik - 01/12/22 11:09 PM
Well There's your problem.
by gfretwell - 01/08/22 12:17 AM
Happy New Year!!
by HotLine1 - 01/04/22 09:50 AM
Sangamo s309.2
by Robski - 12/31/21 04:54 PM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
1 members (gfretwell), 42 guests, and 16 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#179491 07/15/08 05:03 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 444
S
Sandro Offline OP
Member
New residential service, 600amps. We will be doing the power lines from the transformer to the main disco. Utility says we can run a parallel set of 2-350mcm black and one 4ot white.

Why is the undersized neutral ok?

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 947
T
twh Offline
Member
Canadian Electrical Code Rule 4-022 provides for sizing the neutral. It's a trade practice to reduce by two sizes instead of doing the calculation. For example, a 100 amp service with #3 hots has a #6 neutral.

twh #179519 07/16/08 11:18 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 613
M
Member
I'll chime in here. If you decide to reduce the neutral I want calculations and no rule of thumb or trade practice is acceptable in determining the correct size.
Second. If you run parallel in more than 1 raceway then 2 neutrals are going in. 1 for each pipe. See 12-108 for parallel runs. If you can reduce the neutral you can divide the ampacity and install 2 conductors smaller than 1/0 to provide the neutral but there must be a neutral in each pipe as well as bonding conductors if the raceway cannot be used as a bonding method like when using PVC. As stated the rule for reducing neutral is 4-022. Reducing the neutral for resistive 240 volt loads makes sense especially in residential applications where harmonics are almost a non- existent problem.

Last edited by mikesh; 07/16/08 11:20 AM. Reason: add information
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 947
T
twh Offline
Member
A 1000 sq ft house with a full basement, a 12000 watt range and a 6000 watt dryer has a demand of 13500 watts, or 56 amps. It gets a 100 amp service with #6 neutral.

If the same house has an 18 kw electric furnace, it's demand is 31500 watts, or 132 amps. It gets a 200 amp service fed with 2/0 hots. The neutral load is still 56 amps. The ampacity of a 2/0 in a house is 200 amps (note to table 2) and table 17 requires a grounding conductor of 6 awg.

Therefore, this 200 amp service should get a 6 awg neutral.

However, the inspection department has a rule of thumb where they only allow a reduction of two trade sizes, so we must install the larger 1 awg neutral.

I want to do the calculation and install even smaller neutrals. It's in the code.

http://www.codemath.com/cgi-bin/Run.pl?script=Cec8_200

twh #179551 07/18/08 09:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 33
W
Member
I would have to agree with mikesh, harmonics for residential housing are generally not a issue so a smaller neutral is a way to keep costs down. I must say that a 600 amp service for a residence is on the unique side (big). Maybe you should check and see what kind of "harmonic" loads this installation will be running... a smaller neutral may not be a good idea.

twh #179576 07/21/08 03:55 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 613
M
Member
Originally Posted by twh
A 1000 sq ft house with a full basement, a 12000 watt range and a 6000 watt dryer has a demand of 13500 watts, or 56 amps. It gets a 100 amp service with #6 neutral.

If the same house has an 18 kw electric furnace, it's demand is 31500 watts, or 132 amps. It gets a 200 amp service fed with 2/0 hots. The neutral load is still 56 amps. The ampacity of a 2/0 in a house is 200 amps (note to table 2) and table 17 requires a grounding conductor of 6 awg.

Therefore, this 200 amp service should get a 6 awg neutral.

However, the inspection department has a rule of thumb where they only allow a reduction of two trade sizes, so we must install the larger 1 awg neutral.

I want to do the calculation and install even smaller neutrals. It's in the code.

http://www.codemath.com/cgi-bin/Run.pl?script=Cec8_200

Table 17 in BC is #3 Ground for a 200 amp service. No rule of thumb in the code book here.
I take it that table 16 and 17 have changed in Sask since the 2002 code. The new values in the 2006 code were not adopted here.

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 947
T
twh Offline
Member
Quote
I take it that table 16 and 17 have changed in Sask since the 2002 code.
We haven't adopted the 2006 but the inspection department has been allowing us to use either. In 2006, Table 18 is gone and table 17 is changed.

If you calculate the size of neutral for every house, I would expect that, in most cases, the neutral would be reduced and in many cases by more than two trade sizes. I've reduced the neutral by two sizes for so many years that I can't imagine not reducing the neutral. Reducing by more than two sizes seems odd, but it must be okay or it wouldn't be in the code.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
SafetyWired
SafetyWired
Pa, USA
Posts: 44
Joined: July 2013
Top Posters(30 Days)
NORCAL 3
grich 1
Popular Topics(Views)
287,906 Are you busy
220,061 Re: Forum
206,054 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5