ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
dsk 13
Admin 8
doc 3
Recent Posts
Bathroom electrical
by doc. 08/19/17 06:53 AM
electircal ageing test on IPC
by SIAME. 08/15/17 02:43 AM
electrical aging test on IPC
by gfretwell. 08/15/17 12:27 AM
"Line level" audio on Cat 5?
by gfretwell. 08/08/17 10:39 PM
Fire alarm phone lines and color coding
by gfretwell. 08/08/17 10:26 PM
New in the Gallery:
Gallery Test
Popular Topics(Views)
239,996 Are you busy
175,591 Re: Forum
167,838 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 64 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#167014 - 08/04/07 01:35 AM New meter grounding  
wewire2  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
California
The scenario is a building with a 1000 Amp stand up U.G.utility pull section, main and distribution. The utility terminates the service lateral in the bottom of the pull section. A new 200 amp. meter is installed next to and fed from the utility pull section via rigid conduit. If the existing neutral is already connected to an existing grounding electrode system. Where does the NEC say you have to drive another rod at the new meter? We always do but after carefully reading 250.24(A)and 250.24(1)2002 NEC it seems like it is not really required. Any opinions besides more is better?


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#167029 - 08/04/07 11:47 AM Re: New meter grounding [Re: wewire2]  
Alan Nadon  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 399
Elkhart, IN. USA
250.24 ...shall have a grounding electrode conductor connected,...at each service,...
If the 200 amp service is the only service then no additional grounding electrode connection would be needed. However, you are starting with a 1,000 service and then there is the 200 amp service.
You could stay with a single rod at the 1,000 but the GEC would have to be extended from there to the 200 amp.
Does that help ?


Alan--
If it was easy, anyone could do it.

#167074 - 08/04/07 10:25 PM Re: New meter grounding [Re: Alan Nadon]  
wewire2  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
California
Read 250-24 (A)& (1) and then read definition of "service". "The conductors and equipment for delivering electric energy from the serving utility to the wiring system of the premises
served". That seems to read that all of the busing and conductors beyond the landing terminals of the utility are the "service".
I can't find where it says a new meter and disconnect is a new separate/independent service. There is a photo in the 2002 handbook on page 185 that shows one electrode conductor in a common gutter and the service disconnects are just bonded. Now
what do you think? Thanks for the input!


#167075 - 08/05/07 06:45 AM Re: New meter grounding [Re: wewire2]  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
I am confused by the answers here.

There is only one service here as far as the NEC is concerned.

One service with two service disconnecting means.

Both service disconnecting means must be bonded.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#167085 - 08/05/07 12:03 PM Re: New meter grounding [Re: iwire]  
Alan Nadon  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 399
Elkhart, IN. USA
It could be one service or two.
It would be one service if the two service disconnects were grouped. Then the single grounding would comply. (Mental picture of a multi pack with meters and disconnects.)
It would be two services if the two service disconnects were seperated by a distance, (judged by the AHJ) and then would need two groundng electrodes or bonding to a common grounding electrode system. (Mental picture of a fire pump service tapped from a common point with the building service.)
Are my mental pictures in focus ? smile


Alan--
If it was easy, anyone could do it.

#167091 - 08/05/07 02:46 PM Re: New meter grounding [Re: Alan Nadon]  
wewire2  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
California
Driving a rod in an existing developed property can sometimes be a crap shoot. If you hit a undetected sub-structure, the cost to repair it can ruin a guys day/week/month. That is the reason for looking into this code section. To me it reads as one service and bonding the new meter/disconnect would be legal. If that is the case, does the inspecter have the right to demand a new rod? Also I don't see anything in 250.24
about grouping or distance. I only see that in 250.28 bonding. If it is a factor, what is the definition of grouping? Same building, same room, 2 ft, 20ft??
Thanks for the input!


#167094 - 08/05/07 03:23 PM Re: New meter grounding [Re: iwire]  
Scott35  Offline

Broom Pusher and
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,707
Anaheim, CA. USA
I am a little corn-fused by the description, but let me take a shot at this anyway...

Isn't the Grounded Conductor bonded to the Service Equipment + Grounding Electrode System, in either the UGPS or the Service Section already?

Seems like it should be, and the Grounding Electrode Conductor would be sized per 250.66, according to the Service Feeders' size.

You would need to effectively Bond the new Service to the UGPS, via a Bonding Jumper or suitable Bonding Fitings), but I do not think you need to create an additional GES, or add supplimentary Electrodes (Ground Rods) to an existing GES: -
*** unless there is nothing to suppliment an existing Cold Water Electrode ***,
then I could see a need to add an additional supplimental electrode.

What's funny (wierd funny, not "haa-haa" funny) is there will be unbalanced current flowing on the GRC between the new Meter Socket / Service Section, and the existing Service Equipment; due to the solid bonding of the Grounded Conductor to the enclosure of the new Service.

Let me know if this is / isn't applicable to your question.


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!

#167095 - 08/05/07 04:37 PM Re: New meter grounding [Re: Alan Nadon]  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
Originally Posted by Alan Nadon
It could be one service or two.


I don't see how.

One (or one set) of service laterals is 'one service' no matter how many disconnects are tapped off of them.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#167099 - 08/05/07 07:04 PM Re: New meter grounding [Re: iwire]  
wewire2  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
California
It looks like the general consensus is that the neutral is already grounded in the 1000 amp existing panel. This should eliminate the need to reground the neutral
in each new disconnect added. Which leads to bonding issues. As for the unbalanced current you mentioned Scott35(thanks), one thing I noticed, if you look at the drawing (Exhibit 250.12 on page 185 of the 2002 handbook),notice the conduit/nipple is back grounded by the bonding jumper? if everything is bonded I can't figure out what unbalanced current you are talking about?


#167105 - 08/05/07 09:46 PM Re: New meter grounding [Re: wewire2]  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
I agree with Mr. Badger -A Service only needs a single Grounding Electrode (assume it meets 250.50) no matter how many Service disconnects are on it. This should not be confused with the the need to install a Grounding Electrode at a second building on a property when it is fed by a feeder from the first building.


George Little


Member Spotlight
akmaster
akmaster
alaska
Posts: 70
Joined: June 2012
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.014s Queries: 15 (0.002s) Memory: 0.8130 MB (Peak: 0.9937 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-08-20 19:19:49 UTC