ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Hello... again!
by Bill Addiss - 07/15/24 07:14 PM
90.5(C) Explanatory Material 2023
by gfretwell - 07/15/24 01:19 PM
2023 CEU Course
by renosteinke - 07/12/24 03:26 PM
Counterfeit Code Books?
by Comprehensiveedu - 07/12/24 12:16 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 07/11/24 08:51 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 160 guests, and 12 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#154545 05/18/05 10:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
Cat Servant
Member
I'd like to see the following changes in the NEC:

1) I'd like to see 410.4C delete the word "commercial," and apply to all kitchen range hood lights;

2) I'd like to see 240.50, 51 reworded to say "overcurent protective device," rather than "fuses," as there are Edison-base circuit breakers out there;

3) I would like to see 408.4 edited to remove the requirements that circuits (in panels) be identified "in a circuit directory." This is in conflict with the first sentence, which specifies that such identification be "clear, evident, and specific."
"Directories" provided rarely contain sufficient space, they are often mounted in a position that is difficult to read, and they often have an arrangement that bears no relation to the arrangement of breakers in the panel. I assert that placing a lable directly next to, or even atop, the breaker provides a very clear way of identifying a circuit; in the case of a lable on the breaker, such identification is visible even when the cover is removed- and remains accurate as breakers are re-arranged.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#154546 07/20/06 10:01 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 625
S
Member
Reno, I note that the existing language calls for "a" circuit directory, not "the manufacturer-provided" circuit directory. You're free to ignore the one provided by the mfg and make your own. Since said directory is permitted to be on the face of a panelboard, I don't see that there's any legal impediment to placing a label "directly next to" each breaker. (On top of the breaker might be a problem, though.)

(Edited to add: I just saw your other post. It sounds like the code guys agree with me. [Linked Image])

[This message has been edited by SolarPowered (edited 07-20-2006).]


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5