ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
NEC- 314.23 (H) (1)
by GWEnergy - 08/07/22 10:40 AM
Wiring method choice
by gfretwell - 08/07/22 01:29 AM
Back From Retirement
by Bill Addiss - 08/05/22 07:39 PM
Load Calcs for EVs and RVs
by renosteinke - 08/04/22 07:34 PM
The "N" in the THHN/THWN
by HotLine1 - 08/03/22 04:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 25 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#130283 03/02/06 05:27 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 107
J
james S Offline OP
Member
Am i right in saying that you can't use superposition theorem on ac networks unless j notation is used?
I have a parallel network with the components and supply sources labled in j notation,so to avoid messy equations i have tried to convert these values into impedances and supply voltages (with no phase angles) , and continue like you would in a dc network.
The reason why i think you can't do this is because there are inductive and capacitive currents meeting each other changing the characteristics of the circuit currents.Is this correct?

#130284 03/02/06 06:23 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 182
B
Bob Offline
Member
Not sure what you are doing but you can not work with caps and inductors in a DC circuit.

#130285 03/02/06 08:55 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 650
W
Member
"j" notation is not strictly necessary, but you must do _something_ to account for the energy stored and released from the reactive components. using the concept of 'phase angle' and "j" notation is a method for doing this accounting that works quite well when you are working at a single frequency with fixed value components.

Another technique that you could use to figure out these sort of circuits is to calculate how the current changes with time, using equations that have time components (eg V*sine(t) for voltage, C*dV/dt for the current through the capacitor, etc) . The "V/I characteristic" of components ("resistance" generalized) changes with time, so V = I * V/I (Ohm's law) quickly becomes a pretty serious differential equation. This sort of approach is generally not necessary for 'human' calculations, but is quite often used in computer simulations. Also the basic concepts of how a capacitor works are more easily understood in terms of thinking of change in charge over time, so it is a nifty exercise to go from I=C*dV/dt (and the other associated equations) to phase angle and reactance notation.

-Jon

#130286 03/02/06 09:28 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 107
J
james S Offline OP
Member
Thanks jon for your quick reply!
you have just confirmed my thinking of such circuits.Since posting the problem i have worked out the different branch currents using j notation (it took a while),all the text books i have dont venture passed the DC sinario,and say things like this method can be employed for AC circuits changing the resistance for reactance,hence my initial assumption.
thanks again

bob
"and continue like you would in a dc network."
i know you can't work with caps/inductors in dc ,i meant the working out to my problem is treated like a DC circuit.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
RonKipperDatacom
RonKipperDatacom
Kansas City, KS
Posts: 30
Joined: January 2013
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 3
Popular Topics(Views)
294,638 Are you busy
226,406 Re: Forum
211,643 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5