ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 394 guests, and 18 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#113302 04/10/02 12:24 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 597
E
Member
Bill,

In glancing in my '71 NEC, the service conductors could have been as large as 1/0 Cu or 3/0 Al (175 Amps by the Notes to the Ampacity Tables) and the GEC only had to be #4 Al or #6 Cu.

I wonder if that Phillips head screw at the top-right of the neutral assembly is going through to the box? The bonding screws, when used, weren't green back then.

The box looks like ITE. Do you know? The breakers are an assortment of manufacturers, to my eyes.

Al


Al Hildenbrand
#113303 04/10/02 09:08 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 4
Member
Al,

The GEC is not really related to this issue, I just mentioned it because the smaller abandoned #6 above the panel made me think that the service was previously upgraded already.

This had a small Bryant label inside the cover and someone had written 150A in ink on the label. That was it.

Bill


Bill
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5