ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Southwire Recalls Electrical Outlet Boxes
by Admin - 08/21/19 06:39 PM
Fuse blower plug?
by HotLine1 - 08/20/19 01:50 PM
100 year old Light Bulb
by HotLine1 - 08/20/19 01:26 PM
Forum Updates Coming Soon.
by Admin - 08/18/19 01:55 PM
Anybody Remember this?
by Bill Addiss - 08/17/19 09:07 PM
New in the Gallery:
What is this for?
Plug terminals
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 10 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Service Drop or Service Entrance Conductors? #112047 02/05/01 09:54 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,577
Admin Offline OP
Administrator
Member
<img border="0" src=&q...uot;377" height="282">

Click on Photo for a closer look.


Submitted by Frank Cinker Pittsburgh, PA E-mail
CinkerF@cs.com

"A new 200 Amp Service did not pass electrical inspection. The
conductors were too close to window. McGRAW-HILL'S NEC
handbook indicate service drop conductors. NEC section 230.9 states
service conductors. Does this code section apply to service entrance
conductors or service drop conductors?"

Tools for Electricians:
Re: Service Drop or Service Entrance Conductors? #112048 02/05/01 10:43 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Frank,
The code section uses the words "service conductors" so in my opinion it applies to both service drops and service entrance cables. Is that window designed to be open? If not there is no violation in the current code. I would like the 3' restriction to apply to all windows, not just those designed to be opened, but that's not what 230-9 says. Any overhead drops near windows interfere with the placement of fire service ladders in the event of a fire.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: Service Drop or Service Entrance Conductors? #112049 02/05/01 02:18 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 84
C
cinkerf Offline
Member
Don,
The window is designed to be opened. NEC handbook (McGraw-Hill, 1999) seems to indicate both in words and photo that section 230.9 applies to service drop conductors. When in doubt I suppose the current NEC book should used instead of a NEC Handbook.

cinkerf (Frank)

Re: Service Drop or Service Entrance Conductors? #112050 02/05/01 02:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 84
C
cinkerf Offline
Member
I wanted to mention that this code violation will be corrected by extending the service raceway above the window along with the service drop conductors.

cinker (Frank)

Re: Service Drop or Service Entrance Conductors? #112051 02/06/01 01:56 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,912
Bill Addiss Offline
Member
Frank,

I would say that 230-9 is referring to both, in that it addresses the conductors without an overall covering, which would be the Conductors coming out of the Service head and the Triplex from the pole. Since they both (service drop and service conductors) extend to the point of splice, the drip loop would also have to be included.

In the 1990 NEC Handbook (sorry, I don't have a more recent one) It talks of including the drip loop in the clearance requirements. There is even a picture of the drip loops also being above the Window to meet the exception requirements.

If I can get my scanner working I will post a picture.

I hope this helps, [Linked Image]

Bill

Re: Service Drop or Service Entrance Conductors? #112052 02/06/01 02:37 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,912
Bill Addiss Offline
Member
<img border="0" src=&q...t;400" height="273">

Click on Photo for a closer look

Taken from 1990 NEC Handbook


How's this?

[Linked Image]


Bill

Re: Service Drop or Service Entrance Conductors? #112053 02/06/01 11:44 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Frank,
The handbook is not an official interpretation. It is only opinion and as such is no more valid than yours or mine.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: Service Drop or Service Entrance Conductors? #112054 02/06/01 11:55 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 84
C
cinkerf Offline
Member
Bill,

Thanks for the clarification. It seems to make the most sense. Good job on scanning the drawing.

cinkerf (Frank)

Re: Service Drop or Service Entrance Conductors? #112055 02/06/01 12:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 84
C
cinkerf Offline
Member
Don,

You are correct concerning NEC Handbooks. However, they are a very useful. I usually purchase the McGrall-Hill and the NFPA code handbooks each new NEC edition. It's a little expensive but for me it's worth it.

Frank (cinkerf)

Re: Service Drop or Service Entrance Conductors? #112056 02/06/01 01:35 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,912
Bill Addiss Offline
Member
Thanks Frank,

Don,

I am aware that the Handbook is not an Official interpretation. While We are on that subject, though - does that make sense?

Do I dare ask why?
The Handbook I am referring to was published by the NFPA and says (from the jacket)

"All of the commentary material has been researched, written, and reviewed by experts in the field of electrical safety-NFPA staff and members of the National Electrical Code Committee."

Once again, I know what it says (somewhere) about not being an official interpretation, but why isn't it? It looks pretty official to me, and it is being touted as a "must have" for inspectors etc ...

Is there an explanation? Apparently they say it's researched and written by them (NFPA), and you "must" have it, but don't believe anything you read?

I'm confused [Linked Image]

Bill

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Bill Addiss
Bill Addiss
NY, USA
Posts: 3,912
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 21
GeneSF 7
Popular Topics(Views)
257,952 Are you busy
193,678 Re: Forum
183,291 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3