ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
FPE in Germany
by NORCAL - 10/16/19 08:24 AM
Help with aging employee advice.
by Bill Addiss - 10/15/19 10:58 PM
Fuse blower plug?
by gfretwell - 10/13/19 03:23 PM
Power factor and transformer efficiency
by TeslaEdison - 10/13/19 04:05 AM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1 - 10/10/19 07:35 AM
New in the Gallery:
FPE Breaker panel in germany
What is this for?
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (Scott35), 11 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
300.3(B) Violation? #110604 05/27/06 10:59 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,587
Admin Offline OP
Administrator
Member
Quote
Happened to see this while doing some work at a municipal water pumping station. The conductors in the picture are on the load side of a VSD feeding a 400HP 600V pump motor. The circuit consists of two parallel runs of 350kcmil CU THHN per phase. Both conductors of phases B and C are in the left 2”EMT and both conductors of phase A are in the pipe on the right which also has a 4 AWG EGC. At the time pics were made each conductor was carrying about 125A. Wire was cool but pipe on left was noticeably very warm to the touch.

electricman2
[Linked Image]

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: 300.3(B) Violation? #110605 05/27/06 06:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 60
R
Rick Kelly Offline
Member
Can anyone say "Circulating Ground Current"...

Re: 300.3(B) Violation? #110606 05/30/06 08:21 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 134
R
RSmike Offline
Member
Would you expect the one on the left to be warmer since it had more net current in it. There wouldn't happen to be another EGC buried in those wires on the left? Can these wires simply be considered motor leads?

I'd also like to hear more about "circulating ground currents" with respect to being used on a VSD. I thought this type of problem wasn't an issue with a VSD.

Is it possible that the VFD is listed for this type of installation?

RSlater,
RSmike

Re: 300.3(B) Violation? #110607 05/30/06 02:42 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20
J
Jonno Offline
Member
Just thought that I'd offer a bit of insight on this topic. I am a Power Engineer, not an EC, but this is my area of specialisation.

The VFD is likly not doing anything to cause the conduit heating (unless it is malfunctioning). The two conduits are carying the same net current:

Left Conduit:
125<120 A + 125<-120 A = 125<180 A

Right Condit:
125<0 A

If you were to total the two current you would get 0, this is why we combine all 3 phases (and neutral if aplicable) in the same conduit.

The metalic conduit is acting as a curent transformer, the net current in the conductors is inducing a current in hte conduit and because there is a second ground path (the EGC) this current can flow and heats the conduit by P=I^2R.

As you all know the correct way to do this is to split the conductors into two ABC groups. I hope some one will be fixing this.

The only reasons that I can come up with for one being hotter is either a bad bond an one end of the cold counduit or the EGC is carying current.

Re: 300.3(B) Violation? #110608 05/30/06 04:27 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 134
R
RSmike Offline
Member
How stupid am I. VERY! I can't believe I made that previous post.

Makes perfect sense now. Right hand rule stuff. Thanks Jonno.

What do you expect from a guy that only deals with 1HP motors?

RSlater,
RSmike

Re: 300.3(B) Violation? #110609 05/30/06 09:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 60
R
Rick Kelly Offline
Member
Ahhh... but you asked the question.

Re: 300.3(B) Violation? #110610 06/02/06 03:19 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 269
E
electricman2 Offline
Member
The strange thing is it would have been so easy to do it correctly. Three conductors in one pipe and three in the other.


John
Re: 300.3(B) Violation? #110611 06/03/06 10:56 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Jonno,
Do you really need a ground path to heet the metal in a case like this? I thought it was just a result of a magnetic circuit and not an electrical circuit.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: 300.3(B) Violation? #110612 06/05/06 10:23 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20
J
Jonno Offline
Member
Don,

You do need a second ground path, it does not need to be a good one though.

Current will flow along the conduit and needs a path back. This is why we can perfecly safely use single conductor TEK as long as you gorund only ONE end of the sheild.

In the case of this setup, the second conduit would be the return path, because the primary currents are 180 deg out of phase, the induced currets would also be.


Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
HCE727
HCE727
Delaware County, PA, USA
Posts: 186
Joined: November 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
sparky 10
Popular Topics(Views)
259,527 Are you busy
194,919 Re: Forum
184,354 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3