ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photos of the Week:

1913 Electricians Handbook
1913 Electricians Handbook

Random Gallery Image:
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 325 guests, and 19 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 55
I
Member
This section deals with connecting the EGC to a metal box. It specifies that the EGC may be connnected


"to the box with devices suitable for the use..."


This does not appear to define an acceptable technique for connecting the "devices suitable" to the box or to the other EGC in the box.


As an example, let the box have an EGC entering, an EGC leaving, and an EGC connected to the device mounted to the box. Most folks simply use a twist lock to connect the three EGCs together along with a fourth EGC that goes from the twist lock to the single green grounding screw on the box. Speed wise, this is probably the quickest way to make the EGC connections.


Is it code compliant to use a mix of "devices suitable" for making the EGC connections?


Can we simply connect each of the three EGCs to the box using a separate green grounding screw for each? Are you even permitted to drill and tap additional 10-32 holes in the box for additional grounding screws?


Could the entering/leaving EGCs be connected to a single green grounding screw while the device EGC is connected to the box with a green grounding clip? I don't believe that I've seen anything on the box for the grounding screws that limits each grounding screw to a single conductor. If you use crimp connectors on the entering/leaving EGCs, it would seem to be a secure connection, whereas just putting the wires under the screw might not hold.


Thanks!

Horizontal Ad
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
I believe that the answer to all your questions is yes.

Personally, I would trust a screw connection with solid wire over a crimp cap.


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
I will also say yes.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,009
Likes: 37
G
Member
The only thing specifically prohibited is using a sheet metal screw.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 8
Member
E:
"Could the entering/leaving EGCs be connected to a single green grounding screw"

Does this sentence indicate two (2) conductors under one (1) screw??

That would get a "No"

John


John
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 55
I
Member
HotLine1, is that true if the EGCs are terminated in a crimp connector? I realize that you can't put two separate wires under a single screw, one wire would tend to push the other out as you tightened the screw. Tom, I agree that a single wire under a screw is more secure than a crimped ring connector for solid, but this is stranded wire (didn't mention that).

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,009
Likes: 37
G
Member
I read this to say that there were several EGCs spliced together in the box and one of them was bonded to the box under a screw. That is legal. Usually what I see in this case is one of the wires is looped under the bonding screw. If the splicing method is listed I see no problem. Back in the olden days it was common to simply twist solid EGCs together and if there was a significant amount of wire twisted (a couple inches) that worked OK too but it wasn't code compliant. The norm is a crimp ring or a wirenut these days. I am not thrilled with the crimp rings because it is too easy to get a bad crimp. I'm sure there are plenty of people who love them.


Greg Fretwell
Horizontal Ad

Link Copied to Clipboard
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5