ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
EMC Glands on Motors
by Trumpy - 11/30/22 05:32 AM
Ground Rods: Installation and Hook-Up
by Trumpy - 11/30/22 05:10 AM
Colt Firearms Switchbox
by NORCAL - 11/29/22 01:04 AM
Happy Thanksgiving all!
by Bill Addiss - 11/24/22 08:37 AM
Perfect work light?
by gfretwell - 11/22/22 12:48 AM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 25 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#100497 11/22/06 09:46 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline OP
Member
So I have an old main panel I don't want to touch - yet? Customer is cash poor with baby due... But will be changed in near future.

Anyway, would you call this a tap?

All conductors are #2 cu THWN/THHN for the service and feeder conductors- 100A main in backfed old style CH breaker, with 3 other 20A circuits, and a 60' feeder off the lugs to another (new) sub on (E) feeder.

420.2 describes a tap as such:

Quote

Tap Conductors. As used in this article, a tap conductor is defined as a conductor, other than a service conductor, that has overcurrent protection ahead of its point of supply that exceeds the value permitted for similar conductors that are protected as described elsewhere in 240.4.

italics mine....

If the service conductors are 100A, so is the panel MCOP, and the feeder is rated for >100A, not <, how would this be a "TAP"?

Inpector wants an OCPD for the feeder alone. Calling into play the TAP rules.... If the feeder conductors were rated for 80A, I could see that....

What say you?


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with these Exam Prep Combos:
 

>> Master Electrician Exam Prep     >> JourneyMan Electrician Exam Prep
 

#100498 11/22/06 10:19 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,767
Likes: 13
G
Member
Connections to the line side of the service disconnect are not taps, they are still service conductors. All service conductor rules still apply


Greg Fretwell
#100499 11/22/06 10:39 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline OP
Member
This is on the load side of the back-fed Main... The OCP for the feeder is the Main.


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
#100500 11/23/06 10:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 18
D
Member
240.21 explains taps and i dont see where you can have this tap 60' feet long unless its outside or in a high bay building. 240.21(B)(1) is not over 10' and 240.21.(B)2 is not over 25'. if im reading your post correctly the length of your tap is no good.

#100501 11/23/06 11:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
It is not a tap.

A tap to the NEC is a conductor that has an overcurrent device ahead of it larger than the conductors rating.

Quote
240.2
Tap Conductors. As used in this article, a tap conductor is defined as a conductor, other than a service conductor, that has overcurrent protection ahead of its point of supply that exceeds the value permitted for similar conductors that are protected as described elsewhere in 240.4.

In this case all the conductors are rated over 100 amps and the over current protection is 100 amps.

All is safe and it is not a tap.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#100502 11/23/06 12:51 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 18
D
Member
yes the #2's are good for 100 amp. 240.21 requires ocpd in each ungrounded circuit conductor and it shall be located at the point where the conductors receive their supply except as specified in 240.21(A)-(G) which are the tap rules. so where is the ocpd for this feeder. the service main which is 100 amp is the service disconnect and ocpd and the ocpd for this feeder? if its not a tap then it needs a ocpd, not the service main disconnect and ocpd.

#100503 11/23/06 01:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Quote
so where is the ocpd for this feeder. the service main which is 100 amp is the service disconnect and ocpd and the ocpd for this feeder?

Yes, the 100 amp service disconnect / breaker is in fact a legal way of protecting the conductors.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#100504 11/23/06 03:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Bob- If we assumeing copper conductors I agree but if these are aluminum feeder conductors, we have to protect them at 90a.


George Little
#100505 11/23/06 05:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
George Happy T-Day. [Linked Image]

I agree with you, it happens that the Mark mentioned it was #2 cu THWN/THHN.

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#100506 11/23/06 07:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Same to you Bob and your family. And thanks, I missed the "cu" - got to get those glasses cleaned.


George Little
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC Now Available!
 
* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
sbi
sbi
indiana
Posts: 47
Joined: March 2008
Top Posters(30 Days)
Trumpy 6
NORCAL 5
Popular Topics(Views)
300,323 Are you busy
229,995 Re: Forum
214,807 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5