ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 96 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#100126 10/20/06 08:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 308
S
Steve T Offline OP
Member
If the fire pump controller enclosure has an OCPD in it, is it subject to article 695?

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#100127 10/20/06 10:48 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
Y
Member
Yes
Next Question is ,Is it service rated??
Ect ect

#100128 10/20/06 11:45 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 308
S
Steve T Offline OP
Member
I've been told it is not. That the fire pump controller is regulated by NFPA 20.

I have a controller enclosure with a 250 amp OCPD in it. The fire pump is 460 volt, design B, 60 hp, 3 phase, which means the LRA is 435 according to Table 430.151(B).

The engineer of the fire pump controller told me the OCPD is designed to carry 600% of the FLA. He said it would carry this 600% for apx. 8 to 20 seconds.

I am not sure.

#100129 10/21/06 08:31 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
Y
Member
Is it a Listed & Labled unit??

#100130 10/23/06 05:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 308
S
Steve T Offline OP
Member
I'll have to check, but I think so. Does it have to be a listed and labeled unit? Isn't a unit designed by an engineer acceptable?

#100131 10/23/06 05:56 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 308
S
Steve T Offline OP
Member
Here is an excerpt of an email I got in response to my concerns.

The controller in question is our S/N 102490, Peerless #692109, our P/N 705066,
Model MCA-60-46-AHI.
This unit makes use of 250 amp ("F" Frame) molded case circuit breaker (and
isolating switch).
This construction does comply with NFPA-20, UL-218 and FM-1321/1323 fire pump
controller standards.


For a 60 Hp, 460 Vac fire pump motor, the NEC (NFPA-70) value for Full Load Amps
is 77.0 FLA.
The motor will be either a Starting Code "F" or "G" to comply with NFPA-20 Table
9.5.1.1. This allows the motor locked rotor current (LRA) to be up to 600% of
FLA which is 462 amps. The fire pump motor will also be a NEMA Design "B" to comply with NFPA-20 Clause 9.5.1.1.

Although Table 430.151B does apply to NEMA design "B" motors, the LRA value is
only 565% of FLA. Our Fire pump controllers are designed to the higher 600%
(462 Amp) value. The 250 amp rating of the controller Circuit Breaker (and
Isolating Switch) are it's thermal rating. NFPA-20 requires these devices to be
sized at no less than 115% of motor rated FLA. For this motor,
this is 77 x 1.15 = 88.6 amps. Notice that we're using 250 amp devices rather than the 100 amp frame breakers used by our competitors, and as allowed by
code.
Our breaker trip point will be the required 8 to 20 seconds at LRA (462 Amps), also per the codes. Any devices upstream of the controller (fuses, circuit breakers,
switches), however, must be sized at the 600% value or 462 amps, also per code(NFPA-20 and
Article 695 of NFPA-70).

#100132 10/23/06 08:35 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
Y
Member
Put it in . Ul listed and Labeled Service rated Controller.

#100133 10/24/06 06:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 308
S
Steve T Offline OP
Member
So I do not need to consider the size of the OCPD in the controller per the NEC requirements?

What about thermal rating versus the time curve rating, as stated in the comment? Is this a correct interpretation for 'indefinitely' as used in article 695?

#100134 10/24/06 06:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 114
E
Member
Yoopersup, how do you know it complies with NFPA/NRTL regs? Personal experience with the particular model?

To me such wording as the email used is always a big red flag:

"This construction does comply with NFPA-20, UL-218 and FM-1321/1323 fire pump
controller standards."

It does comply? So says who? "NRTL Listed to standard XYZ" is the type of wording I would find more reassuring. I've seen all sorts of equipment that is "designed to meet" or "complies with the requirements of...", that has never been certified by an OSHA-regulated NRTL or other industry-recognized body. In some cases, as inside your own Listed end-use product, it may OK (but more complicated) to use such unrecognized parts.

#100135 10/24/06 09:57 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
Y
Member
I;ve inspected several units like this. Are you telling me if its a Listed and labled unit you can say no way. Read 695.4 (B)1 A Listed Fire Pump Controller.
695.4 (B) 1 Is for Additional disconnecting means.Read 695.4 COMPLETELY. Not just sections of it.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5