LOL! That was a good one! -- Even though I think the name is pronounced more like BOUger, which carries a different flavor of sorts... Seriously though, I appreciate ALL the responses. I just have not heard any response yet that really demonstraits this idea as being a bad one. As said in my previous posts, there is a definate varying time period where the sparky would not be touching the bare exposed conductors during the "unknown" energization time frame. I am betting that roughly 75% of the time spent working MOST circuits, that no bare wire contact is being made - There could be several possible instances in that time frame where, circuit has been powered up and contact/shock has not -YET- occured. The warning could sound during those critical times. -- I kind of get the feeling here that we have "enough" safety procedures with our trade and that this would be just another safety device that an electrician would -maybe- reluctently use at best. Perhaps we should not try to improve things too much and just learn to take our shocking experiances like a real lectrician... -J ---- Airbags!!! We dont need no stinkin airbags! (Chevrolet 1970 safety dept. meeting) ----
[This message has been edited by sponge (edited 09-05-2005).]
[This message has been edited by sponge (edited 09-05-2005).]
