Joe,
I think I understand the principle here is to make sure, via safety training that this person is aware of the Hazards involved.
My last comment was really directed to Sparky, who had said that the paragraphs following the accepted change had laid out the "what" - referring to what the training should consist of. My original thoughts were that it was left wide open as to what (specifically) that training should include. Comments back to me pointed out that the specified OSHA regs were included as guidelines for a required course of study. I am just pointing out that unless I am missing something It does not lay out recommendations for a complete course of study. That still has to be decided by the Adopters of the code.
Is this correct?
(I tried a little formatting for emphasis)
Bill
