Originally Posted by Tesla
JBD...

I would think that having a 2-pole breaker hanging loose inside the Service panel was a Code violation.

It should be on the rails or completely removed and the conductors safetied off.

The dead front for the Service panel looks to be missing -- and I'd bet large that it does not have the appropriate KO fillers.

The weatherhead looks profoundly abused by the crew. Busting out NEMA components and then cobbling them back together violates their listing. It's not a listed product when you've hacked it to pieces -- literally -- and then fudged its re-assembly.

The fundamental integrity of the Service drop is shot. Eyeballing the riser drop for dielectric quality does not get 'er done. I would always presume that hidden damage to the insulation has risen far up the conductors -- as the heat starts from the inside out.

Since the conductors are always metal -- with a fantastic tendency to conduct heat, too -- I'm compelled to assume that the conductors got plenty toasty right up until they passed into free air. In sum, I'd deem the riser conductors as shot, the meter pan as shot, the weatherhead as shot, the meter as shot... I'd even worry about the bugs. The offending current was passing IN FRONT OF THE OCPD.

Who really knows how intense the peak arc was?

Putting damaged gear back into service means putting unlisted gear into service. Installing unlisted gear is an NEC no-no. No item retains its listing after suffering obvious significant damage.

Arc damage IS serious damage.... It's at the top of anyone's list. eek

The 'looted breakers' in the Service panel are suggestive of major malfunctions across the entire residence. It looks like the entire zone has been hacked to pieces.



The loadcenter breaker status is difficult to assess, as the video says that breakers were moved/removed do the the loss of the "A" phase.

Listed equipment is not a requirement for most of the NEC. Field modifications and repairs are common (e.g. stuck/frozen thread fasteners). Replacement of components into existing enclosures is a routine event. The AHJ is the one to pass judgment on the end result.

There is no doubt that the physical labor violated many safety safety codes and regulations. Until I see the final installation I cannot say how many NEC compliance issues exist. But, based on their use of electrical terms and tools, I am sure problems will be found.

My point is simply, based on the video the NEC is the wrong code to reach for first, Other than maybe article 100 definition of "qualified".