Quote
..1910.333(b)(2)(iv)

1910.333(b)(2)(iv)

Verification of deenergized condition. The requirements of this paragraph shall be met before any circuits or equipment can be considered and worked as deenergized.

1910.333(b)(2)(iv)(A)

A qualified person shall operate the equipment operating controls or otherwise verify that the equipment cannot be restarted.

1910.333(b)(2)(iv)(B)

A qualified person shall use test equipment to test the circuit elements and electrical parts of equipment to which employees will be exposed and shall verify that the circuit elements and equipment parts are deenergized. The test shall also determine if any energized condition exists as a result of inadvertently induced voltage or unrelated voltage backfeed even though specific parts of the circuit have been deenergized and presumed to be safe. If the circuit to be tested is over 600 volts, nominal, the test equipment shall be checked for proper operation immediately after this test.

A and B seem to be in conflict. I can't see using the controls to verify a deenergized condition. How would you account for interlocks that may prevent the operation of the equipment at the time you operate the controls and may permit the machine to start later when, for some reason, the interlocks have been satisfied.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)