ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 04/24/17 05:43 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
How do you find a good employee?
by HotLine1. 04/22/17 10:44 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,747 Are you busy
169,496 Re: Forum
162,789 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 66 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#98647 - 02/12/05 11:08 AM Type MC Whips  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Quote
330.30(D) Unsupported Cables.

Type MC cable shall be permitted to be unsupported where the cable:

(2) Is not more than 1.8 m (6 ft) in length from the last point of cable support to the point of connection to a luminaries (lighting fixture) or other piece of electrical equipment and the cable and point of connection are within an accessible ceiling.

For the purpose of this section, Type MC cable fittings shall be permitted as a means of cable support.


Some interpret the last sentence as allowing the support up to 6 feet from each fitting to permit 11 feet, 6 inches of cable from a box to a luminaries without support.


Opinions?


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#98648 - 02/12/05 12:13 PM Re: Type MC Whips  
dmattox  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 265
Anaheim, CA
They are stretching a clarification at the end to defeat what the previous paragraph clearly states.

All it is saying that if you are going to a fixture or piece of equipment, the last 6' doesn't need to follow the normal support rules.


#98649 - 02/13/05 10:53 PM Re: Type MC Whips  
PCBelarge  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
Dobbs Ferry, NY, USA
Art 320 has the same wording, but Art 334 has left out the last sentence from similar wording. Does this mean the NM fitting is does not follow the same requirements?

Pierre


Pierre Belarge


Member Spotlight
The_Lightman
The_Lightman
Orlando, Fl, USA
Posts: 49
Joined: August 2001
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.009s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7517 MB (Peak: 0.8728 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-26 19:28:47 UTC