ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
twh 10
Recent Posts
Any UL 508 experts out there?
by sparkyinak. 05/21/17 08:57 PM
Heat pump conundrum
by sparkyinak. 05/21/17 08:49 PM
Interesting week
by HotLine1. 05/20/17 11:57 AM
Electrical Pricing Guide
by ElectricianBud. 05/18/17 12:17 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
236,081 Are you busy
170,974 Re: Forum
164,094 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (gfretwell), 61 guests, and 12 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#23374 - 03/16/03 04:55 PM Revenge is Sweet!  
rowdyrudy  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 169
Mascoutah, IL USA
This happened a few years ago in Louisville, KY.
My company had the contract for a building at the University of Louisville. Min conduit size was ¾”. Slab roughed on Friday, top layer of re-bar too high. Engineer said remove ¾” and change to ½” in slabs. He said we’ll work out the change order later. We removed the ¾” and installed ½” on a Saturday to ready for pour on Monday.
Several months later I was in the engineer’s office to finalize several items and changes. When I brought up the conduit change he said “You got anything in writing?” and refused to OK the change.
A couple of years later, we had another project where the same engineer was involved. This was a retrofit of central HVAC units to several connected buildings. The specs had each of the 8 buildings as alternates. All service originated in building 1, rose to the roof, and was distributed from there. The plans for the alternates clearly stated “…all work on these plans for building (X) shall be alternate (X). Building 3, 4, and 5, were not accepted but 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8 were accepted. We ran the feeders for buildings 6, 7, and 8 to the edge of building 2 and terminated. We went to building 6 and completed the feeders for 6, 7, and 8. The big gap of buildings 3, 4, and 5 had no feeders. (Feeders were 500MCM in GRS).
In a meeting the engineer admitted his goof and said go ahead, I’ll issue a change order. Not to be burned twice, I declined and said I would put together a price and wait for a change order.
To shorten this a bit, I got triple what I would normally have received and later I told the jerk, “Remember the U of L project? Well, I just got my money back 10 times over.”
Rowdy


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#23375 - 03/16/03 10:49 PM Re: Revenge is Sweet!  
smurf  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 31
Benton, Ar. USA
Good Job, Rowdy, every dog has his day.


#23376 - 03/16/03 11:25 PM Re: Revenge is Sweet!  
ga.sparky56  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 558
young harris georgia usa
Chalk one up for the good guys! Attaboy Rudy!


#23377 - 03/17/03 09:33 PM Re: Revenge is Sweet!  
harold endean  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
Boonton, NJ
I had that feeling several times. When I was a contractor several GC's stuck me for money. Now you should see their face when I walk on the job as the AHJ. Their first reactions is "What are you doing here." When I tell them that I am the inspector, their jaw hits the floor. Then they usually stammer and ask something like, "Do you miss being in your own business? Or do you like it better?" Then I usually reply, "YES I DO. I don't have to worry about working for people who stick me for money." That usually ends the conversation. [Linked Image] Also when I do their plan review, I usually take my time. I am allowed 20 business days for plan review. Sometimes it takes me 19 days to plan review their prints.



Member Spotlight
Niko
Niko
Campbell, CA
Posts: 356
Joined: August 2006
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.013s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7605 MB (Peak: 0.8886 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-23 03:14:35 UTC