ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
Fujifilm Recalls Power Adapter Wall Plugs
by Admin. 01/16/18 07:04 PM
VDE 0100 to introduce AFCIs
by sparky. 01/16/18 06:36 PM
Air Compressor feeder conductor sizing
by Potseal. 01/15/18 09:08 PM
Under carpet cable?
by HotLine1. 01/15/18 09:57 AM
New in the Gallery:
Housebilding DIY wiring
SE cable question
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 19 guests, and 6 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Bathroom Surprises #108543
03/30/04 08:45 AM
03/30/04 08:45 AM
electure  Offline
OP
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,263
Fullerton, CA USA
Submitted by Big John

During the renovation of a bathroom, these photos were taken of the violations as they were discovered:

[Linked Image]

This box was discovered behind one layer of tile and two layers of sheet-rock.


[Linked Image]

This switch box was set back at least 1.25 inches from the finished surface of the wall. Even with the "mounting-screw extension" only the very tip of the switch lever protruded beyond the cover plate


[Linked Image]

Another buried box, this time unsecured and with no cover. This one found behind the ceiling in the shower stall.


[Linked Image]

The receptacle was originally installed sometime in the '70's so it may predate the GFCI requirement. However, it was replaced within the last couple years and still no GFCI (the copper pipe is the vent stack for the sink that was mounted right next to it). The NM cable below was feeding a pull-chain light above the sink, no junction box, the splice simply buried in the wall.


[Linked Image]

This beauty was also buried in the ceiling. The original splices came through a crows-foot and were held behind that hanging light canopy before the NM was tied in. The NM cables feed the receptacle in the previous picture and an overhead light.


[Linked Image]

This is my favorite, it makes absolutely no sense: This is the setup for the vapor-tight light fixture in the shower stall. The feeder into the far octagon box, then into a custom J-box in the middle, both of which were buried behind the ceiling. There isn't even a splice inside the custom J-box: The conductors from the BX go right out of an open KO and join the fixture wires in that flying splice above the joist. If the BX had been simply connected directly to the box for the vapor-tight fixture, they would've saved two additional J-boxes and prevented several code violations.

Big John

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: Bathroom Surprises #108544
03/30/04 02:53 PM
03/30/04 02:53 PM
D
DougW  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,143
North Chicago, IL
Ahhh, but you're trying to apply logic to what these cretins were doing!

Love the pics! Thanks!

Re: Bathroom Surprises #108545
04/01/04 10:02 AM
04/01/04 10:02 AM
T
ThinkGood  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Milwaukee, WI
Actually, wouldn't the concealed junction boxes have been OK before the NEC was changed?

This does, however, look much like the houses I have seen in this area that are gutted and remodeled, especially the shot of the box in the area of the lathe (sp?).

Re: Bathroom Surprises #108546
04/01/04 05:26 PM
04/01/04 05:26 PM
W
wa2ise  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 785
Oradell NJ USA
They didn't bother to remove the old light fixture when they connected the romex cables in that ceiling? Was the light bulb socket in it still connected?

"I'm having roast rabbit for Easter dinner" [Linked Image]

Re: Bathroom Surprises #108547
04/01/04 08:14 PM
04/01/04 08:14 PM
B
BigJohn  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 391
Boston, MA
Quote
...Wouldn't the concealed junction boxes have been OK before the NEC was changed?
I don't know when 314.29 was written, but I don't think it was legal to bury boxes in the '70's, either.

All the work was open-frame and yet almost none of the cables were secured. Even where available none of the equipment grounds were properly bonded. It's not a code violation, but the conductors weren't twisted in those flying splices, leaving only the wire nuts to support the weight of the cables.

The husband admits to doing a lot of the work himself. Wife says they contracted some out to an "electrician". I'm hoping she's mistaken just because I hate the idea that there are people running around charging homeowners for installing this kind of mess. [Linked Image]

Wa2ise
No, no light bulb in that fixture. [Linked Image]

[And ignore my finger in the second picture... [Linked Image]]

-John

[This message has been edited by BigJohn (edited 04-01-2004).]

Re: Bathroom Surprises #108548
04/02/04 08:27 PM
04/02/04 08:27 PM
B
Bomzin  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 28
Utah
Well you know what they say, out of site out of mind.

Neil

Re: Bathroom Surprises #108549
04/02/04 11:40 PM
04/02/04 11:40 PM
Lostazhell  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,431
Bakersfield, CA (Originally Or...
Big John writes: "I don't know when 314.29 was written, but I don't think it was legal to bury boxes in the '70's, either."


From the lathe board & what looks like type "R" wiring... are you referring to the 1870's?

Randy


Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Scott35
Scott35
Anaheim, CA. USA
Posts: 2,708
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
sparky 23
Admin 19
Potseal 13
Popular Topics(Views)
243,514 Are you busy
180,311 Re: Forum
170,804 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.024s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9867 MB (Peak: 1.1392 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-01-17 00:57:26 UTC