ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Featured:

 Electrical
 Clearance

 *
 Tools
 *

 Books

 *

 Test Equipment

 

Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 555 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 830
S
Member
Tom, I was talking USE cable. It would not extend over 6 ft. inside the dwelling, as I was going to convert over in a junction box just inside the penetration of the outside wall. As of now I have decided just to go with copper conductors # 8 thhn, just to cover the load of the motors and pool light, and general use receptacle. Homeowner does not forsee a "swimming pool heat pumpt" to be installed. Thanks for the information and input.

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

Workgear for Electricians

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 345
T
Member
gfretwell Member posted 08-04-2006 11:04 AM
Quote
Tom, He is talking about the feeder to a sub panel. I am not sure 680.21(A)(1) applies since it says "branch circuit". I agree it may be a distinction without a difference but that is the language we have.
gfretwell
I buy that. I guess I wasn't reading carefully enough. That raises another question. Could I supply a panel in an out building with three wire cable under the alternate feeder to out buildings rule and then supply pool equipment from that panel? That would seem an invitation to stray neutral current problems. The grounding electrode provided by an in ground pool would likely be a lower resistance electrode than the two driven rods the code would permit for that feeder configuration.
--
Tom Horne

"This alternating current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous for general use." Thomas Alva Edison


Tom Horne

"This alternating current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous for general use" Thomas Alva Edison
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Tom- 680.25 covers this. Looks like we need to have an equipment grounding conductor but in some cases it can be uninsulated.


George Little
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,048
Likes: 38
G
Member
I think Ryan drove a solid copper stake through the heart of 250.32(B)(2) for 2008


Greg Fretwell
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5