ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Featured:

 Electrical
 Clearance

 *
 Tools
 *

 Books

 *

 Test Equipment

 

Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 193 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 15
E
Member
"I will stand fast with my interpretation and will look for your proposal in the 2008 NEC."

...which is exactly what this boils down to. The AHJ has the final word right or wrong. (a devisive issue indeed) I happen to agree with Don for whatever that is worth. I don't think that because you find one bad worst-case example (photo) that you throw the baby out with the bathwater and declare prohibition on splicing EGC's in a panel. I don't think a EGC needs to be continuous like GEC's. If I'm on a job and don't have a ground bar, I would like to think I am not jeopardizing practical safgaurding by splicing a couple of grounds together because I don't want to double up grounds on the bar.

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

Workgear for Electricians

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 29
R
Member
And I thought interpretation of nuclear radiogical controls policies and practices was bad. I feel your pain.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 197
G
Gwz Offline
Member
Would the case of 'terminal bar' vs 'terminal bars' for grounding conductors of 408.20 be better served if the wording was " grounding terminal bar(s)" ?

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5