ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 434 guests, and 31 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Scott35

How in the heck can we expect to get the point across to the members here, if we have to deal with this type of foolish code interpretation!

I would challange that inspector immediately to include the entire building department in that city, and ask where they got this information!

This is a serious waste of your time, my time, and the valuable time of our members!

Can you provide an email address for this person or city department so we (I) can let the inspector know that he is incorrect!!

PS: The weather here in San Diego right now is very pleasant! I am sure it will be the same in Phoenix next week!


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 1
Scott35 Online Happy OP
Broom Pusher and
Member
E-Scott and Joe,

You guys are right! I should have made an inquiry to the Inspector about this, in order to try and help out where code items are mistaken (and to stop rampant errors from being repeated).

I will make inquiry to article quotes the next time this comes up.

Also will cover this crucial point (print-out multiple copies of this thread) to the persons I mentioned in the original topic starting post, so they will have a reference to go by - instead of just saying "Scott T. Says So", and also join the crucade to remove bunk-NEC quotations!

Very imbarassed!!!

Scott35 S.E.T.

p.s. maybe this thread is enlightening to members, so they can experience how even a simple thing such as GEC coloring might be something to think more about with an inspection... at least not to follow my example!
[Linked Image]
s.e.t.


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Scott35:

I will be here to support you.

[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 03-08-2003).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
What section of the code can be cited to say that the GEC cannot be green?
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 169
R
Member
None that I know of either.
I did'nt care for it when Chicago included in their code, to prohibit the color green from the grounding conductor. I wrote an amendment to our code to require it to be green. I thought that it being green is more practicle.

Russ

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 939
F
Member
indeed that is very instering part about using egc ... but somehow i try rember older codes book say the same thing ( i have 96 verison and 99 with me and 02 partal done allready) BUT this can make other persons confuseing about useing egc i can understand that about the colour codes using that and unforealy in france the colour is green with yellow strips but by the way check on the internaonal colour codes i am sure they will say the same thing about the egc but all i want to make it more uniform with all sparkys here and inspecter to work together to slove this probem what we been dealing for very long time i know some of the old timers here can recall it the same way as now still kinda of mess here and i will like have every one join in together and get this mess clear up [Linked Image]

merci marc


Pas de problme,il marche n'est-ce pas?"(No problem, it works doesn't it?)

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
See 310.12(B) and 250.119 ..... says it all!

We have to stop beating up on the dead horse!!

I am sure, again based upon my knowledge of past proposals that this issue was discussed in the proposed changes to the 1996 NEC.

If someone can look into the ROP I believe the committee comment to the proposal to color the GEC green, will clear the up question.

IF THE NEC IS USED, THE GEC CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED AS A GREEN CONDUCTOR!!



[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 03-07-2003).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Joe,
There is nothing in the two sections that you cited that says you can't use green for the grounding electrode conductor. The wording in 250.119 requires the use of green for equipment grounding conductors, but does not forbid its use for the grounding electrode conductor. There is no wording in the NEC that reserves green for equipment grounding only. While 310.12(C) can be cited to prevent the use of green for an ungrounded conductor, it can't be cited to say that green can't be used for the GEC. If the grounding electrode conductor can be any color except white, gray or green, how can we comply with 310.12(C)??? The grounding electrode conductor is a grounding conductor. I think that you can make a better case, that the GEC must be green by citing 310.12(C), then you can by citing 250.19 and 310.12 to say that the GEC can't be green.
Yes, there was a proposal and panel statement, an inspector must cite a section, not an panel comment, on the violation notice. There is not a code section in the 2002 code that prevents the use of green for the grounding electrode conductor.
Quote
250.119 Identification of Equipment Grounding Conductors.
Unless required elsewhere in this Code, equipment grounding conductors shall be permitted to be bare, covered, or insulated. Individually covered or insulated equipment grounding conductors shall have a continuous outer finish that is either green or green with one or more yellow stripes except as permitted in this section.

Quote
310.12 Conductor Identification.
(A) Grounded Conductors. Insulated or covered grounded conductors shall be identified in accordance with 200.6.
(B) Equipment Grounding Conductors. Equipment grounding conductors shall be in accordance with 250.119.
(C) Ungrounded Conductors. Conductors that are intended for use as ungrounded conductors, whether used as a single conductor or in multiconductor cables, shall be finished to be clearly distinguishable from grounded and grounding conductors. Distinguishing markings shall not conflict in any manner with the surface markings required by 310.11(B)(1).
The wording in the two sections quoted above is clearly different than the wording in 200.7 that reserves the use of white or gray for the grounded conductor. If green is to be exclusively for the equipment grounding conductor, and not for the grounding electrode conductor, then the code must be changed.
Quote
200.7 Use of Insulation of a White or Gray Color or with Three Continuous White Stripes.
(A) General. The following shall be used only for the grounded circuit conductor, unless otherwise permitted in 200.7(B) and (C):
(1) A conductor with continuous white or gray covering
(2) A conductor with three continuous white stripes on other than green insulation
(3) A marking of white or gray color at the termination

Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Don:

You can live with your interpretation and your personal opinion, and be among those in the industry who might agree with you.

I will stick to my guns, and continue to call it a VIOLATION!


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Joe,
Please quote the actual words in the NEC that say you can't use green for the GEC. All you ever do, when challenged as to the actual code wording, is say "I'm right and you're wrong" without citing code words to back up your statements. This forum is to be a learning process, and if it is to work as such, the actual code language must be used. The sections that you cited say what you must use green for, but do not limit the use exclusively to EGCs. This is just like 110.15 where the use of orange is required for the high leg of 120/240 volt 3 phase 4 wire delta system, but this rule does not prevent the use of orange on other conductors.
Is a grounding electrode conductor an "grounding conductor"? If it is, please tell me how 310.12(C) can be complied with when you are using a color other than green for the GEC. If the GEC is not a "grounding conductor", then what is it?
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5