|
|
|
0 members (),
218
guests, and
12
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,393
OP
Member
|
Ok,thanx Greg, if there are no code and/or manufacturer's violations either way, i guess i need to ask for pro's and con's here
~S~
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,393
OP
Member
|
http://www.tristateindustrialgroup.com/sites/tristate/uploads/documents/Transformers.pdfwuz given the above in a continued effort to dislodge my cranim from my large intestine
of note is pg 14 >>>>>>>>> Y Y Closed / Neutral Prim Yes Sec Yes , which is what i believe i've been trying to describe. The following from it>YY Closed / Neutral Prim yes Sec-yes
The Primary Nuetral should be tied firmly to the system nuetral, otherwise exessive voltage may develop on the secondary side
If 3ph load is unbalanced, part of the load current flows in the primary neutral
The 3rd harmonic componet of the Xformer exciting current also flows in the primary neutral
For these reasons, it is necessary that the neutrals be tied together as shown
If this tie were omitted, the line to neutral voltages on the secondary would be very unstable
That is, if the load on one phase were heavier than on the other two, phases would rise
Also, large 3rd harmonic voltages would appear bettween lines and neutral, both in the xfomer, and in the secondary system, in addition to the 60HZ component of voltage.
This means that for a given value of RMS voltage, the peak voltage would be much higher than that for a pure 60Hz voltage
This overstreeses the insulation both in the Xformer and in all apparatus connected to the secondaries
Last edited by sparky; 09/07/11 09:54 PM.
|
|
|
|
Posts: 75
Joined: June 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
